Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lennar Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38M
Granted FY2024still arriving
174
Grants FY2024still arriving
28
States reached
$5.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$36MHealth$35MPhilanthropy$12MYouth Development$9.9MFood & Nutrition$7.0MHousing & Shelter$6.7MRecreation & Sports$4.6MEmployment$4.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 174 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $203k
  • $10k–50k70 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k48 grants · $4.5M
  • $250k+21 grants · $32M
$25,000
Median grant
28
States reached
$173M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HOPE$5,075,000
VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC$5,000,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC$5,000,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC$2,500,000
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$1,517,360
OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER$1,460,000
BREAK-N THE CYCLE NONPROFIT CORP$1,250,000
BUILDING TALENT FOUNDATION$1,200,000
MIAMI DADE COLLEGE$1,005,000
CLIMATE SUMMIT MIAMI BEACH HOST COMMITTEE INC$1,000,000
BLACK AMBITION OPPORTUNITY INC$1,000,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA$1,000,000
AMIKIDS INC DBA AMIKIDS TAMPA$781,126
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$734,181
DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE$706,135
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORGOTTEN LEGACY FUND INC: $15k → 8%INTERFAITH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $100k → 16%GULF COAST KIDS HOUSE INC: $15k → 16%BALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $15k → 12%With Love Oregon Inc: $10k → 8%Project Lemonade Inc: $15k → 12%DENVER CHILDRENS HOME FOUNDATION: $137k → 12%SANTAS POSSE: $10k → 9%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $50k → 8%BANCROFT NEUROHEALTH: $10k → 12%MARION COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $150k → 16%HOPE FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%There With Care: $25k → 12%SANTAS POSSE: $10k → 9%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $25k → 8%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC: $25k → 13%AUTISM CARES FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%FAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS: $30k → 10%MORGANS INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $15k → 16%VILLAGES OF HOPE INC: $100k → 11%PEARL PROJECT INC: $50k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $25k → 8%CASA DE AMPARO: $15k → 11%SACRAMENTO CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 12%VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $300k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $10k → 8%FOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $13k → 6%CASA DE AMPARO: $10k → 11%HOPE ACTIVE: $30k → 16%HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC: $185k → 13%Mary's Place Seattle: $15k → 9%BANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $25k → 7%CASA DE AMPARO: $23k → 11%HOMEAID AMERICA INC: $266k → 10%HOMEAID AMERICA INC: $1.1M → 10%HOMEAID AMERICA INC: $455k → 10%HOMEAID AMERICA INC: $30k → 10%HomeAid America Inc: $30k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE INC: $50k → 15%HOMEAID AMERICA INC: $20k → 10%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $235k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 15%FUNDACION HERMANOS DE LA CALLE INC: $100k → 15%STYLE SAVES INC: $100k → 15%STYLE SAVES INC: $100k → 15%STYLE SAVES INC: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Lennar Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 44% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Lennar Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$109M · 94 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

94 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 109 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
78

Total granted

$109M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+11%

Still filing today

76%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    5× · 2020–2024 · $26M · revenue +66%
  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +10%
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $6.0M · revenue ×45 · 89% of their budget

Funded once

  • P
    POLICYLINK
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -42%
  • NM
    NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
  • BC
    BROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
8
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
9
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
10
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
11
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Break'n the Cycle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesCommunity College Foundatio…Military Veterans SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Environmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesYouth Development CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Equine Therapy ProgramsAffordable Housing Construc…Jewish Community Organizati…Youth Mentoring ProgramsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Youth CampsYouth Sports ProgramsFaith-Based Social ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…School District FoundationsCommunity Food PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%6%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr9%27%35–55yr12%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%16%<5yr16%8%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr9%12%35–55yr12%10%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/222
the rest of the field
17%
17,088/102,822

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

216 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 216 of the 288 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
213/216
Grantees still filing
115/216
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

City of Hope — $30,125,000 · OtherCity of HopeBUILDING TALENT FOUNDATION — $3,200,000 · OtherFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $2,338,006 · OtherDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $2,799,085 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $3,500,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC+120 more — $22,452,406 · Other+120 moreUniversity of Miami — $26,103,344 · EducationUniversity of Miami+19 more — $4,421,796 · Education+19 moreVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER F…UNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $1,612,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI F…GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIA…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY F…BROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyBROWARD COL…UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …+6 more — $560,066 · PhilanthropyMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $6,400,000 · Religion+1 more — $15,000 · ReligionOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $5,960,000 · Youth Development+2 more — $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEAID AMERICA INC — $1,931,500 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $285,000 · Human ServicesSTYLE SAVES INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesCONGRESSIONAL WOMENS SOFTBALL GAME INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC) — $185,000 · Human Services+25 more — $1,489,440 · Human ServicesBREAK'N THE CYCLE — $4,000,000 · Recreation & SportsPARKS FOUNDATION OF MIAMI-DADEINC — $250,000 · Recreation & Sports+4 more — $209,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$64,414,497Education$30,525,140Philanthropy$13,172,566Religion$6,415,000Youth Development$6,080,000Human Services$4,640,940Recreation & Sports$4,459,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Miami — $26,103,344 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $6,400,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000,000 over 2y, 89% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $5,960,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetBREAK'N THE CYCLE — $4,000,000 over 4y, 75% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $2,799,085 over 5y, 18% of budgetCLIMATE SUMMIT MIAMI BEACH HOST COMMITTEE INC — $2,000,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetBlack Ambition Opportunity Inc — $2,000,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetHOMEAID AMERICA INC — $1,931,500 over 5y, 33% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $1,612,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS — $1,455,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPOLICYLINK — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $1,000,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetFlorida Memorial University Inc — $866,324 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE BUILDERS CAREER CONNECTIONS — $700,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $453,884 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $387,410 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCalifornia Homebuilding Foundation — $340,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $319,814 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER INC — $300,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $285,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSTYLE SAVES INC — $250,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPARKS FOUNDATION OF MIAMI-DADEINC — $250,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetFERRE FAMILY FOUNDATION DBA MAURICE A FERRE FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL WOMENS SOFTBALL GAME INC — $200,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetNORTH STATE BUILDING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE HAWN FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC) — $185,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global — $183,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME — $160,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLOTUS MARION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetFUSION-FRIENDS UNITED TO SHELTER — $150,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetWACCAMAW YOUTH CENTER INC — $144,500 over 4y, 28% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc — $143,864 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME FOUNDATION — $136,800 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetVALERIE'S HOUSE INC — $130,003 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCAMILLUS HOUSE INC — $125,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAREERSPRING FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAutism Strong Foundation — $120,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetHelping a HeroOrg — $112,816 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLEE BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION BUILDERS CARE — $110,000 over 2y, 22% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Charitable FoundationME20.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Gap Foundation · Homeful Foundation · The Rothman Family Charitable Foundation · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Carmax Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lennar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 310%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Friends of the Underline Inc66% of income from government
  • Womanspace Inc47% of income from government
  • Urban League of Broward County Inc44% of income from government
  • Womens Center of Jacksonville Inc37% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc23% of income from government
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc23% of income from government
  • Sean Locke 24 Foundation21% of income from government
  • Helping Advance and Nurture the Development of Youth Inc (Handy Inc)21% of income from government
  • With Love Oregon Inc16% of income from government
  • Gulf Coast Kid's House Inc16% of income from government
  • Project Lemonade Inc15% of income from government
  • Florida Memorial University Inc11% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc5% of income from government
  • The Pearl Project Inc2% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc2% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Oneblood Inc1% of income from government
  • Barry University Inc1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc0% of income from government
  • Lauren's Kids Inc0% of income from government
  • Fundacion Hermanos De La Calle Inc0% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc0% of income from government
  • Valerie's House Inc0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
31get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lennar Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lennar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 288 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph