Skip to content
Legacy Health Endowment at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Legacy Health Endowment

FUNDING HEALTHCARE FACILITIES AND CLINICS IN PROVIDING DIRECT HEALTH CARE SERVICES AND ACCESS THERETO, INCLUDING WELLNESS PROGRAMS, HEALTH RESEARCH, HEALTH EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FORMED TO IMPROVE HEALTH TO THE RESIDENTS IN THE EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER'S SERVICE AREA.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$19MEducation$1.9MHuman Services$801kFood & Nutrition$426kReligion$190kCrime & Legal$105kCommunity Improvement$35kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $309k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
$44,513
Median grant
1
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HOSPICE$170,000
Individual grant recipient$102,331
GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH$96,396
Individual grant recipient$84,969
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$76,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$73,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $50k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $125k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $20k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STOCKTON: $25k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $500 → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $170k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $50k → 15%SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 15%CREATIVE ALTERNATIVES: $100k → 15%TURLOCK PREGNANCY AND HEALTH CENTER: $100k → 15%TURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER: $100k → 15%JESSICA'S HOUSE: $50k → 15%SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 15%SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $45k → 15%JESSICA'S HOUSE: $40k → 15%HAVEN WOMEN'S CENTER OF STANISLAUS: $21k → 15%TURLOCK PREGNANCY AND HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 15%JESSICA'S HOUSE: $10k → 15%TURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER: $5k → 15%SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $5k → 15%HAVEN WOMEN'S CENTER OF STANISLAUS: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Legacy Health Endowment’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 91%.

Legacy Health Endowmentlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 34 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
42

Total granted

$20M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+8%

Still filing today

44%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +156%
  • CH
    Community Health Centers of America
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5.3M · revenue ×45 · 32% of their budget
  • GV
    GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH URGENT CARE
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • CH
    COVENANT HOME SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · $210k · revenue +4%
  • VC
    VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCAREgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $175k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
2
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
Complete Care Community Health Center I

The organization's mission is to eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for underserved communities in california.

Health
5
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
6
Communicare Health Centers

Communicare health center's mission is rooted in the underlying philosophy that health care is a right, not a privilege. our mission is characterized by the following commitments: (i) we provide comprehensive and high-quality health care…

—
7
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
8
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
9
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
10
Community Hospital of San Bernardino

Community hospital of san bernardino ("chsb") is a non-profit, full-service, acute care facility in business to provide acute inpatient care, long-term care and a wide range of ancillary and therapeutic care to the community we serve. our…

Health
11
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
12
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Human Services; the most unlike its peers is We Care Program - Turlock. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5,996,303 · HealthLIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTHCommunity Health Centers of America: $5,329,691 · HealthCommunity Health Centers of AmericaGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS: $2,308,000 · HealthGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERSCASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,585,900 · HealthCASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC+7 more: $452,500 · HealthFIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH URGENT CARE: $500,000 · OtherFIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH …Individual grant recipient: $361,965 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Individual grant recipient: $334,704 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Individual grant recipient: $271,364 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…FIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH URGENT CARE CENTER: $240,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $219,000 · OtherSIERRA VISTA CHILD FAMILY SERVICES: $205,000 · OtherDENAIR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $187,000 · OtherCOVENANT CARE HOME & HOSPICE: $185,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $172,726 · Other+48 more: $2,297,419 · Other+48 moreSierra Vista Child & Family Services: $295,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $220,000 · Human ServicesTURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER: $215,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $150,000 · Human ServicesCREATIVE ALTERNATIVES INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesJESSICA'S HOUSE: $100,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $70,500 · Human Services+3 more: $40,000 · Human ServicesUNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION: $283,000 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT HOME SERVICES: $210,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterPRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC: $170,000 · ReligionSONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS: $10,000 · ReligionCAMP TAYLOR INC: $150,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,000 · Youth Development
Health$15,672,394Other$4,974,178Human Services$1,190,500Philanthropy$283,000Housing & Shelter$215,000Religion$180,000Youth Development$155,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5,996,303 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetCommunity Health Centers of America: $5,329,691 over 7y, 32% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS: $2,308,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,585,900 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetSierra Vista Child & Family Services: $295,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION: $283,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetFIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH URGENT CARE CENTER: $240,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $220,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER: $215,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetCOVENANT HOME SERVICES: $210,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE: $175,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC: $170,000 over 5y, 73% of budgetST LUKES FAMILY FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetCAMP TAYLOR INC: $150,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $150,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE ALTERNATIVES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJESSICA'S HOUSE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $70,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEMC HEALTH INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINGS VIEW: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTURLOCK CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetTURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLGBTQ COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE CARE PROGRAM - TURLOCK: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSTANISLAUS COUNTY POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Access National Network CANN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetStanislaus Health Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Centers of America ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Sierra Vista Child & Family Services ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH URGENT CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOME SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKES FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TAYLOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds JESSICA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stanislaus Community …Emc Health FoundationCovenant Ministries o…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sutter Valley Hospita…Sunlight GivingPublic Health Institu…United Way of Stanisl…Sierra Health Foundat…Teichert FoundationThe Samaritan Project…Mary Stuart Rogers Fo…
Stanislaus Community FoundationCA36.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stanislaus Community Foundation · Emc Health Foundation · Covenant Ministries of Benevolence · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Public Health Institute · United Way of Stanislaus County · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Teichert Foundation · The Samaritan Project Inc · Mary Stuart Rogers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legacy Health Endowment funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legacy Health Endowment. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Legacy Health Endowment?

    Find your warmest path to Legacy Health Endowment through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Legacy Health Endowment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home