· Public charity
Emc Health Foundation
EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION is committed to promoting and expanding care for members of the community as whole persons, considering their physical, psychosocial, and spiritual health in an atmosphere of professional excellence and human kindness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $248,011 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $320,510 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $72,499 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MONTE VISTA CHAPEL | $24,000 |
| UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| TOWER PHARMACY | $15,011 |
| SACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL-TURLOCK | $14,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC2× · 2019–2020 · $140k · revenue +60%
- TCTURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC2× · 2021–2022 · $116k · revenue +5%
- TGTURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION2× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- USUOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRYone grant, 2021 · $360k
LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +160%- SVSIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILYone grant, 2019 · $105k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…
Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.
To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.
The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.
To provide primary health and dental care services to low income patients in the Central Coast Communities of California
Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Clinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas (CSVS) is dedicated to providing access to quality comprehensive health care to men, women and children with an emphasis on farm worker families and the agricultural community.
Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.
The mission of Vista Community Clinic is to advance community health and hope by providing access to premier health services and education for those who need it most.
A community health center offering medical, dental, health education services, outreach/enrollment services, mental health services and substance abuse disorder services to uninsured and under insured persons based on a federal poverty…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingston Community Health and the most unlike its peers is The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Stanislaus Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health Centers of America ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION TURLOCK ↗
- Who funds VIA HEART PROJECT ↗
- Who funds The Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services ↗
- Who funds SONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK CHAPLAINCY INC ↗
- Who funds PRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Legacy Health Endowment · Stanislaus Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Covenant Ministries of Benevolence · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Emc Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Emc Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Emc Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.