How much did EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

women'sphysician salary

2021

mental counselingtele-behavioralunified

2022

behavioral fellowshipcovid mentalmental counseling

2023

—

2024

food insecuritygenericinsulinmental

2025

hearing aidaudiology

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $29k
$10k–50k5 grants · $83k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$20M

Total assets

Largest grants

GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS$25,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS DBA LA FAMILIA CENTRAL VALLEY$20,000
TIN RX PHARMACY$18,296
PRODIGAL SONS AND DAUGHTERS$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
TOWER PHARMACY$8,512
SONSHINE MINISTRIES DBA WESTSIDE MINISTRIES$5,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY$5,000
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION$5,000
TURLOCK CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.1M

$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%

+28%

Still filing today

44%

17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SH
STANISLAUS HEALTH FOUNDATION
3× · 2020–2022 · $350k · revenue +33% · 42% of their budget
US
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $275k · revenue +241%
CF
CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS
2× · 2019–2020 · $140k · revenue +43%

Funded once

US
UOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
one grant, 2021 · $360k
LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTHgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +65%
SV
SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY
one grant, 2019 · $105k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sunset Community Health Center

To deliver comprehensive and preventive primary care in a culturally sensitive, compassionate and professional manner, ultimately improving the health of our patients and responding to the health and education needs of our communities.

Health

Sierra Family Medical Clinic Inc

The mission of Sierra Family Medical Clinic, Inc. (SFMC) is to provide quality integrated primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care to all persons of Nevada and Sierra County and surrounding communities regardless of age, sex,…

—

Adventist Health Tulare

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

—

Complete Care Community Health Center I

The organization is devoted to serving the medical needs of the underprivileged of california.

Health

Family Healthcare Network

To provide health care services to socially and economically depressed sectors of the southern San Joaquin Valley in California.

Health

Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communities and a patient centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health

Santa Rosa Community Health Centers

The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Valley Health Team Inc

VHT's mission is to provide accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner regardless of ability to pay.

Health

The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter

Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health

Sonora Community Hospital

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health

Mustard Seed Community Health

To provide high quality, holistic integrated healthcare to those in need, in an environment that dignifies and empowers the whole person.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingston Community Health and the most unlike its peers is Prodigal Sons & Daughters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/15

Grantees still filing

11/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,608,015Health$415,000Philanthropy$305,000Human Services$135,000Religion$15,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Legacy Health EndowmentCA26.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy Health Endowment · Stanislaus Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Covenant Ministries of Benevolence · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: STANISLAUS HEALTH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~49 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 942830419 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on STANISLAUS HEALTH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 49 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 42% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Emc Health Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Emc Health Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Emc Health Foundation?

More from the funding graph

EMC HEALTH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Emc Health Foundation?

More from the funding graph