Skip to content
Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.1MPhilanthropy$1.0MInternational$775kEducation$358kFood & Nutrition$155kReligion$85kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$2,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA$2,000,000
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $10k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $25k → 15%SUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $10k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $25k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $25k → 15%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $15k → 13%HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 39% of Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 37% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 14 repeat orgs$306k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$4.2M
$306k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+46%

Still filing today

93%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    2× · 2023–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +19%
  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +56%
  • UC
    UDAYAN CARE USA
    5× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +110% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • FO
    Federation of Jain Associations in North Americagraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $65k · revenue +72%
  • JE
    JAIN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -85%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
2
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
3
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
5
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
6
Friends of Aravind Inc Dba Aravind Eye Foundation Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in such activity as may be necessary, appropriate or otherwise helpful to support, provide assistance to or perform functions of aravind eye hospital and postgraduate institute of ophthamology…

Health
7
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
8
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
9
Global Brigades Inc

Inspire, mobilize, and collaborate with communities to achieve their own health and economic goals.

Education
10
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
11
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
12
Akiptan Inc

To innovate and change the paradigm of investment in indian country agriculture and food systems.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nyaya Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $3,000,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA+1 more: $85,000 · HealthGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILAN…KARUNA-SHECHEN USA: $140,000 · PhilanthropyKARUNA-SHECHEN USA+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUDAYAN CARE USA: $200,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $50,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $35,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA: $20,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · International+3 more: $20,000 · InternationalUniversity of Chicago: $200,000 · EducationPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $142,500 · EducationArpan Foundation Inc: $25,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $15,000 · EducationCOOPERATIVE FEEDING PROGRAM INC: $150,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT: $25,000 · OtherFederation of Jain Associations in North America: $65,001 · OtherJAIN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $19,503 · OtherHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $15,000 · Human ServicesAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $95,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$3,085,000Philanthropy$1,150,000International$395,000Education$382,500Other$334,504Human Services$125,000Food & Nutrition$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $3,000,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUDAYAN CARE USA: $200,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FEEDING PROGRAM INC: $150,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPINE CREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $142,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKARUNA-SHECHEN USA: $140,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $95,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNYAYA HEALTH: $85,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFederation of Jain Associations in North America: $65,001 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetJAIN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArpan Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAuroville International USA: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION: $5,001 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Tilonia Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundati…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Express Foun…Silicon Valley Commun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
Globalgiving Foundation IncDC14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Express Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Latika & Rajiv Jain Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Latika & Rajiv Jain’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home