Skip to content

· Private foundation

Latattore Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$207k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MArts & Culture$291kEducation$217kHuman Services$63kInternational$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kYouth Development$20kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $183k
$11,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$30,000
FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH$25,000
PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & HISTORY$25,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$21,703
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
CATALYST OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES$15,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$11,000
TRANSCENDANCE YOUTH ARTS PROJECT$10,500
A REASON TO SURVIVE$10,000
BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE$5,380
HUMBLE DESIGN INC$5,200
OLIVEWOOD GARDENS AND LEARNING CENTER$5,000
PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION$5,000
A STEP BEYOND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 82% of grant dollars ($1.6M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 18% that went abroad ($338k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%TOGETHER WITH THE CHILDREN: $5k → 12%TOGETHER WITH THE CHILDREN: $5k → 12%TOGETHER WITH THE CHILDREN: $5k → 12%OLIVEWOOD GARDENS AND LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 11%OLIVEWOOD GARDENS AND LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
NC
TX

Beyond the US: 18% of all-years giving ($338k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$328k · 24 grants
Canada$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
38

Total granted

$1.7M
$287k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

56%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $152k · revenue +34%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    5× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +91%
  • TM
    THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $73k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $38k · revenue 0%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $29k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is We Are All Human Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATI: $253,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATIDOCUMENTARY OF CULINARY POPULAR: $197,782 · OtherDOCUMENTARY OF CULINARY POPULARMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $194,500 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERUT HEALTH SCIENCE CTR JOSEPH: $191,245 · OtherUT HEALTH SCIENCE CTR JOSEPHHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUND: $125,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDASSURED IMAGING WOMEN'S WELLNESS: $52,500 · Other+48 more: $482,297 · Other+48 moreUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $152,295 · EducationUC SAN DIE…transcenDANCE Youth Arts Project: $20,500 · EducationtranscenDA…BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE: $20,380 · EducationBARRIO LOG…+2 more: $10,000 · EducationChildren's Hospital Corporation: $110,803 · HealthChildren'…THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $37,500 · HealthTHE METHO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $28,500 · HealthST JUDE C…THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $73,303 · Arts & CultureA Reason To Survive: $30,100 · Arts & CultureA Step Beyond: $13,000 · Arts & CultureTRANSCENDENCE THEATRE COMPANY: $10,300 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $35,750 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $40,000 · ReligionOLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER WITH THE CHILDREN: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$1,496,324Education$203,175Health$176,803Arts & Culture$137,703International$40,750Religion$40,000Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $152,295 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $110,803 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $73,303 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $35,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetA Reason To Survive: $30,100 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $21,701 over 3y, 0.2% of budgettranscenDANCE Youth Arts Project: $20,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE: $20,380 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $15,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTOGETHER WITH THE CHILDREN: $15,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetA Step Beyond: $13,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTRANSCENDENCE THEATRE COMPANY: $10,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO FAMILIAR CRISTIANO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE ARE ALL HUMAN FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHappy Hearts Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLAUDE JONES TRUST XXXXX3004: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLESLEY UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,355 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF WISDOM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC INSTITUTE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERS AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds A Reason To Survive ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
  • Who funds transcenDANCE Youth Arts Project ↗
  • Who funds BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WITH THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
  • Who funds A Step Beyond ↗
  • Who funds TRANSCENDENCE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO FAMILIAR CRISTIANO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Conrad Prebys FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Thomas C Ackerman Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Latattore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Latattore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Lesley University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Latattore’s filings →

More from the funding graph