· Private foundation
Larry and Anna B Harris Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TURNING POINT USA | $17,000 |
| FBIAA MEMORIAL COLLEGE EDUC FUND | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $7,500 |
| Tunnel to Towers Foundation | $4,000 |
| JOYFULL WORLD MINISTRIES | $4,000 |
| APD CHAPLAIN UNIT FUND | $3,500 |
| Students Clothing Bank | $3,000 |
| BARRETT FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| Heart Gallery of NM Foundation | $2,500 |
| ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOC OF NM | $2,500 |
| Daughters of Charity of Canossa | $2,500 |
| ARCA Foundation | $2,000 |
| ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| SAFE HOUSE | $1,500 |
| Albuquerque Rose Society | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +70% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC5× · 2021–2025 · $57k · revenue +107%
- FAFBI AGENTS ASSOCIATION MEMORIAL COLLEGE FUND6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +76%
- ATABC TO CEO LTD4× · 2020–2023 · $17k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- POPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $5k
- OBOREGON BASSET HOUND RESCUE INCone grant, 2020 · $3k
- HHHEADING HOMEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +70%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of argos, a shelter dog rescue is: to rescue animals from situations that are abusive, endangering, or neglectful. to rescue animals in danger of being euthanized in new mexico shelters/pounds. to provide necessary veterinary…
To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.
Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.
New mexico pets alive offers hope for homeless pets by meeting the challenge with creativity and 21st century solutions inspired by the past 10+ years of success of neighboring states achieving no - kill communities (saving all healthy and…
Ark-Valley Humane Society's (AVHS) Mission is ensuring the welfare of companion animals through compassion and care. AVHS operated an open-admission animal shelter for Chaffee County, Colorado.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
The mission of the cheyenne animal shelter is to enhance the quality of life for animals and people through compassion, respect and education.
Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.
At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of the Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds FBI AGENTS ASSOCIATION MEMORIAL COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ABC TO CEO LTD ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BARRETT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS AND STRIPES INC ↗
- Who funds Students Clothing Bank ↗
- Who funds Rio Grande Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE HOUSEINC ↗
- Who funds ARCA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHAMA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CASA DE SOCORRO INC ↗
- Who funds Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CARRIE TINGLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND BELLE BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds C A R E DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUND EQUINE OPTIONS ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE RESCUE INC OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Don & Colletta McMillian Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Give Back Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larry and Anna B Harris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Larry and Anna B Harris Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Larry and Anna B Harris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.