Skip to content
Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000 at a glance

· Private foundation

Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$74kEmployment$61kHealth$53kReligion$43kFood & Nutrition$37kHuman Services$32kEnvironment$24kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STREET YOUTH MINISTRY OF AUSTIN (SYM)$7,000
PRODUCE FROM HEAVEN$5,982
THE GATEWAY ACADEMY INC$5,000
THE JED FOUNDATION$5,000
Mount Evans Home Health Care & Hospice$5,000
BELONG BAKERY$4,500
THE MASTERS APPRENTICE$4,000
SAFE WATER NETWORK$4,000
KID MEALS INC$3,000
GRACEWOOD INC$3,000
PEO EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND (ELF)$3,000
CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
CROSS LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC$2,500
OUR SPOT KC$2,500
P E O STAR SCHOLARSHIP$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $5k → 9%CROSS LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $3k → 16%OUR SPOT KC: $3k → 15%MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $2k → 12%TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $5k → 9%MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $1k → 12%MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $1k → 12%KID MEALS INC: $4k → 16%KID MEALS INC: $3k → 16%KID MEALS INC: $3k → 16%KID MEALS INC: $3k → 16%KID MEALS INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$332k · 17 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$332k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+8%

Still filing today

94%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    Street Youth Ministry of Austin
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +10%
  • TG
    The Gateway Academy Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +31%
  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • NS
    NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • N
    Newspring
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -23%
  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
2
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
3
Next Move Homeless Services

To help families with children and individuals achieve self-reliance

—
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
National Alliance to End Homelessness

The national alliance to end homelessness, inc. (the "alliance") is a nonpartisan organization committed to preventing and ending homelessness in the united states.

Housing & Shelter
6
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
7
Strategies to End Homelessness Inc

Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.

Human Services
8
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
9
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
10
San Francisco Safehouse

The organization works in concert with San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation to provide transitional housing, supportive services, and aftercare to aid and support homeless women who have been commercially sexually exploited…

Human Services
11
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
12
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Newspring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Gateway Academy Inc: $33,038 · EducationThe Gateway Academy IncPEO STAR Scholarship: $20,500 · EducationPEO STAR ScholarshipPEO Educational Loan Fund: $20,000 · EducationPEO Educational Loan FundCONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · EducationCONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOU…Street Youth Ministry of Austin: $40,000 · ReligionStreet Youth …BE THE GIFT INCORPORATED: $3,300 · ReligionBE THE GIFT I…THE JED FOUNDATION: $33,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUND…NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $5,000 · HealthNAMI SANTA CL…THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthTHE METHODIST…PRODUCE FROM HEAVEN: $20,355 · OtherPRODUCE FROM HEAVENMOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DBA MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE AND HOS: $10,000 · OtherMOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DB…Newspring: $4,200 · OtherSAFE WATER NETWORK: $23,900 · OtherSAFE WATER NETWORKTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $19,000 · OtherTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE IN…+3 more: $6,500 · Other+3 moreGRACEWOOD INC: $27,200 · Housing & ShelterGRACEWOOD I…ABODE SERVICES: $10,200 · Housing & ShelterABODE SERVI…KIDS' MEALS INC: $16,290 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS…TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $9,102 · Human ServicesTRINITY CEN…MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $4,200 · Human ServicesMERCY HOUSI…CROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCROSS-LINES…OUR SPOT KC: $2,500 · Human ServicesOUR SPOT KCBELONG BAKERY: $31,000 · EmploymentBELONG BA…
Education$84,538Religion$43,300Health$41,000Other$83,955Housing & Shelter$37,400Human Services$34,592Employment$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStreet Youth Ministry of Austin: $40,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe Gateway Academy Inc: $33,038 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBELONG BAKERY: $31,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetGRACEWOOD INC: $27,200 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE WATER NETWORK: $23,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPEO STAR Scholarship: $20,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEO Educational Loan Fund: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $16,290 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetABODE SERVICES: $10,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DBA MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE AND HOS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $9,102 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNewspring: $4,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $4,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBE THE GIFT INCORPORATED: $3,300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrime Stoppers of Houston Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF KS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Commu…Enterprise Holdings F…Colorado Gives Founda…Shell USA Company Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…
Greater Houston Community FoundationTX13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home