· Private foundation
Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STREET YOUTH MINISTRY OF AUSTIN (SYM) | $7,000 |
| PRODUCE FROM HEAVEN | $5,982 |
| THE GATEWAY ACADEMY INC | $5,000 |
| Mount Evans Home Health Care & Hospice | $5,000 |
| THE JED FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BELONG BAKERY | $4,500 |
| THE MASTERS APPRENTICE | $4,000 |
| SAFE WATER NETWORK | $4,000 |
| KID MEALS INC | $3,000 |
| PEO EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND (ELF) | $3,000 |
| GRACEWOOD INC | $3,000 |
| CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| OUR SPOT KC | $2,500 |
| P E O STAR SCHOLARSHIP | $2,500 |
| CROSS LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SYStreet Youth Ministry of Austin6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +10%
- TGThe Gateway Academy Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +31%
- TJTHE JED FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +142%
Funded once
- NSNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -24%
- NNewspringone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -23%
- TMTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
To help families with children and individuals achieve self-reliance
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
The national alliance to end homelessness, inc. (the "alliance") is a nonpartisan organization committed to preventing and ending homelessness in the united states.
Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.
Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.
See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…
The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…
The organization works in concert with San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation to provide transitional housing, supportive services, and aftercare to aid and support homeless women who have been commercially sexually exploited…
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Newspring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Street Youth Ministry of Austin ↗
- Who funds The Gateway Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELONG BAKERY ↗
- Who funds GRACEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE WATER NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PEO STAR Scholarship ↗
- Who funds PEO Educational Loan Fund ↗
- Who funds THE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ABODE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DBA MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE AND HOS ↗
- Who funds TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK ↗
- Who funds NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Newspring ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS ↗
- Who funds BE THE GIFT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Crime Stoppers of Houston Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR SPOT KC ↗
- Who funds CROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF KS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larkins 2019 Charitable Trust Xxxxx5000 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.