Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lark Ellen Lions Charities

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2020
23
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Youth Development$96kHuman Services$64kEducation$60kHealth$46kCommunity Improvement$23kArts & Culture$22kRecreation & Sports$17kReligion$15k
02FY2020 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY$5,722
ACADEMY OF MUSIC FOR THE BLIND$5,500
BLIND CHILDRENS CENTER$5,000
SCHOOL ON WHEELS$5,000
HILLSIDES$5,000
CENTRAL CITY ACTION COMMITTEE$5,000
LION'S CAMP AT TERESITA PINES$4,500
BRAILLE INSTITUTE YOUTH CENTER$4,500
SALVATION ARMY YOUTH CENTER$4,500
EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO$4,500
DOLORES MISSION$4,500
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$4,000
MEND$4,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$4,000
PROYECTO PASTORAL AT DOLORES MISSIO$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HILLSIDES: $5k → 14%HILLSIDES: $4k → 14%HILLSIDES: $4k → 14%HILLSIDES: $3k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA: $3k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA: $3k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $8k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $6k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $6k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $5k → 14%MEND: $4k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 14%MEND: $3k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 14%MEND: $3k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 14%MEND: $3k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 22 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$340k
$259

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +35%
  • MB
    MARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $22k · revenue +150%
  • TB
    The Blind Childrens Center Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $19k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • D4
    DISTRICT 4L1 YOUTH EXCHANGE
    one grant, 2019 · $259
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
2
Valley Center for the Blind

To support, train, and employ people who are blind or low vision and increase their opportunities to lead an independent and fulfilling life.

Health
3
Candela Group

The mission of the Candela Group is to bring stability and an improved quality of life to our clients and their loved ones affected by mental illness by uniting them with public and private mental health services Our lived experience as…

Health
4
Ala Costa Centers a Program for Developmentally Disabled

To provide each student or participant with the access, skills, and opportunities needed to become successful and productive members of society, and to encourage them to have some fun along the way. The Organization offers support and…

—
5
Partners for Pediatric Vision

To turn possibilities into achievements for children with visual impairment and their families. we envision a world where all children with visual impairment have equal access to healthcare,education, and support to be successful in life.

Health
6
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
7
San Gabriel Valley Training Center Residential Facility

To provide residential and supportive services for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. To achieve this mission the organization has constructed three residential homes and a recreation building.

—
8
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
9
Community Housing Options Integrated Community Employment & Social Services

Provide Independent Living Services for persons with developmental disabilities who want to live, work and socialize in the community. Including housing, assistance in entering the workforce, shopping, adult education and other community…

Human Services
10
Abilities Oc

To help people with developmental disabilities reach their highest potential and guide them through their special needs journey.

Human Services
11
The Relational Center
Philanthropy
12
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School On Wheels Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marshall B Ketchum University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY YOUTH CENTER: $21,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY YOUTH CENTERMD-4 STUDENT SPEAKERS FOUNDATION: $19,595 · OtherMD-4 STUDENT SPEAKERS FOUNDATIONBRAILLE INSTITUTE YOUTH CENTER: $17,500 · OtherBRAILLE INSTITUTE YOUTH CENTERCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $15,500 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riversi…DOLORES MISSION: $15,000 · OtherDOLORES MISSIONPROYECTO PASTORAL AT DOLORES MISSIO: $14,500 · OtherPROYECTO PASTORAL AT DOLORES MISSIOJONATHAN JAQUES CANCER CENTER: $12,000 · OtherJONATHAN JAQUES CANCER CENTEROLD TIMERS CLUB 121: $12,000 · OtherOLD TIMERS CLUB 121+4 more: $4,583 · OtherEL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO INC: $23,425 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO INCHILLSIDES: $16,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDESALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $14,000 · Human ServicesALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CEN…MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $12,500 · Human ServicesMEND - Meet Each Need Wit…Wayfinder Family Services: $11,500 · Human ServicesWayfinder Family ServicesMARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY: $22,022 · EducationMARSHALL B KETCHUM UNI…The Blind Childrens Center Inc: $18,750 · EducationThe Blind Childrens Ce…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $18,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC826LA: $8,000 · Education826LALIONS CAMP AT TERESITA PINES: $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIONS CAM…HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY I…Academy of Music for the Blind: $18,500 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL CITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $18,000 · Community Improvement
Other$131,678Human Services$77,425Education$66,772Youth Development$29,500Arts & Culture$18,500Community Improvement$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO INC: $23,425 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY: $22,022 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $18,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAcademy of Music for the Blind: $18,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIONS CAMP AT TERESITA PINES: $16,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHILLSIDES: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $14,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget826LA: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Academy of Music for the Blind ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CITY ACTION COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIONS CAMP AT TERESITA PINES ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗
  • Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
  • Who funds 826LA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lark Ellen Lions Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lark Ellen Lions Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lark Ellen Lions Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Lark Ellen Lions Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lark Ellen Lions Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph