Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lariccia Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$100kArts & Culture$80kHuman Services$27kAnimals$15kCommunity Improvement$13kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YSU FOUNDATION$50,000
STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS$14,000
THE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE$10,000
PLAYHOUSE SQUARE FOUNDATION$10,000
EDWINS FOUNDATION$10,000
SIMPLY SLAVIC$7,500
YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE$5,000
OH WOW$5,000
BRITE CLEVELAND - BRITE WINTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%EDWINS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%EDWINS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 10 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$217k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +7%
  • SS
    SIMPLY SLAVIC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +136%
  • PS
    Playhouse Square Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AC
    ANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    ANIMAL CHARITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • EA
    EARTH ANGEL FARM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Downtown Arts Theater Inc

Throughout 2024, the organization engaged in renovating and restoring a state-of-the art venue for hosting movies and live events. we hope this venue contributes to the economic and cultural development of downtown wooster, wayne county,…

Arts & Culture
2
Know Theatre of Cincinnati

Know Theatre is a small professional theatre showcasing voices, new works, & plays that embrace the inherent theatricality of the live experience. Know Theatre seeks to be a place where artists and audiences feel welcome to take artistic…

Arts & Culture
3
Art Opportunities Inc

To create community driven public art and launch careers for youth and artists.

Arts & Culture
4
Bucks County Playhouse Theater Inc
Arts & Culture
5
The Falls of the Ohio Foundation

To inspire a sense of wonder in the falls of the ohio region through education, preservation, and exploration.

Environment
6
Theatre Y

Create connections between diverse artists seeking mutual growth through collaboration.

Arts & Culture
7
Shango Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
9
Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park

We are Cincinnati's national theater - committed to bringing diverse, engaging works of great artistry to our community, and to putting Cincinnati's artistic excellence in the national spotlight.

Arts & Culture
10
Civic Theatre of Allentown Pa

The mission: the theatre is dedicated to providing high-quality performing arts to enhance the quality of life in the lehigh valley community. civic carries out its mission by presenting affordable theatre, music and art-house cinema, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Sandusky State Theatre Inc

The sandusky state theatre was originally created in 1928 and was reinvented several times since its inception. the arts, particularly the performing arts, are a reflection and a documentation of our culture and society. therefore, in…

Arts & Culture
12
Players Club of Swarthmore

The Players Club of Swarthmore is an all-volunteer community theater committed to providing a welcoming environment that fosters training and development in the performing arts, artistic excellence and enriches the cultural life of the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youngstown Cityscape Inc; the most unlike its peers is Disabled American Veterans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YSU FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherYSU FOUNDATIONDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $12,000 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSANIMAL CHARITY: $5,000 · OtherEARTH ANGEL FARM INC: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $4,500 · OtherSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC: $19,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE …Playhouse Square Foundation: $15,000 · Arts & CulturePlayhouse Square Foundatio…THE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE: $12,500 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSEOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA …SIMPLY SLAVIC: $18,500 · Community ImprovementSIMPLY SLAVICYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC: $13,000 · Community ImprovementYOUNGSTOWN CIT…EDWINS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC: $10,000 · Animals
Other$126,500Arts & Culture$56,500Community Improvement$31,500Human Services$15,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC: $19,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSIMPLY SLAVIC: $18,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDWINS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE: $12,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Youngstown Fdn GeneralOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Youngstown Fdn General · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · J Ford Crandall Depository · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Valley Economic Development Partners Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lariccia Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lariccia Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lariccia Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph