Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Valley Economic Development Partners Inc

To support the creation and expansion of small businesses and local jobs where economic opportunity is needed most through education classes and flexible lending solutions in collaboration with other community development organizations.

$784k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$784k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Community Improvement$6.0MHuman Services$419kHealth$211kFood & Nutrition$99kArts & Culture$69kEnvironment$40kAnimals$40kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$784,171
Median grant
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$784,171
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%VAST FILMS LTD: $10k → 13%PHYSICAL THERAPY & OCCUPATIONAL REHAB INC: $10k → 16%DTS DANCE LLC: $10k → 16%LAKESIDE 4 M DBA LAKESIDE GOLF COURSE: $10k → 19%CARDINAL ELECTRIC POWER INC: $10k → 16%IK LLC: $10k → 16%CHANCE ELECTRIC LLC: $10k → 19%CARDINAL ELECTRIC POWER INC: $10k → 16%ANDREA ROMAN: $10k → 16%VILLONE LLC: $10k → 19%1COAT INDUSTRIAL COATINGS LLC: $10k → 16%PREFERRED CARE ASSOCIATES LLC DBA PREFERRED CARE COUNSELING: $10k → 16%EDWARD J VILLONE: $10k → 19%WING'S WAY DRIVE THRU INC: $10k → 16%PRECISION PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC: $10k → 16%LITTLE HUNAN RESTAURANT INC: $10k → 19%PREFERRED CARE PARTNERS LLC: $10k → 16%SHELLY COLE - MONLEY DBA A SENSE OF WONDER EARLY CARE & EDUCATION PROGRAM: $10k → 16%MARK COLE AGENCY LLC: $10k → 19%COOPERCARE LLC: $10k → 16%OSAS LLC: $10k → 16%PALADIN BREWING LLC: $10k → 19%BEST WESTERN PLUS DUTCH HAUS INN AND SUITES: $10k → 16%NORTHEAST OHIO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK LTD: $10k → 16%PASKIDS PROPERTIES LLC DBA CANDLEWOOD SUITES: $10k → 19%AARROW DISPOSAL LLC: $10k → 16%SSED LLC DBA CAFE 422: $10k → 16%UHER AGENCY INC: $10k → 19%YELLOW JACKET INVESTMENTS LLC: $10k → 16%KIMBERLY JAMES DBA CHEERTIME ATHLETICS CORP: $10k → 16%M FOODS LLC: $10k → 19%M2 GOLF MANAGEMENT LLC: $10k → 16%OHIO GYMNASTICS INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 19%PHYSICAL THERAPY & SPORTS REHAB INC: $10k → 16%DJL ACCOUNTING & CONSULTING GROUP INC: $10k → 19%WARREN RECOVERY GROUP INC DBA WARREN FAMILY RECOVERY: $10k → 16%SUNPRO TANNING LLC: $10k → 19%SEAN PRICE DBA A HOME INSPECTIONS: $10k → 16%SUPERIOR HOSPITALITY LLC DBA COMFORT INN HOTEL: $10k → 19%SHANZI LIMITED: $10k → 16%MEANDER INN INC (DBA HAMPTON INN - YOUNGSTOWN WEST): $10k → 19%DIVAS DESIGNERS OF HAIR AND NAILS LLC: $10k → 16%CHIPPER'S INC: $10k → 19%PREMIER EXPEDITED SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%JOAN KUBIK & ASSOCIATES LLC: $10k → 19%DIANA M HOOVER: $10k → 16%WARREN COMMERCE PARK CORP: $300k → 19%VALLEY GROWTH VENTURES LLC: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 60 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

60 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
550

Total granted

$2.9M
$5.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+48%

Still filing today

2%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    VARIOUS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.7M
  • GR
    GERALD R DELORENZO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k
  • CC
    CAFFE CAPRI INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k

Funded once

  • WC
    WARREN COMMERCE PARK CORP
    one grant, 2020 · $300k
  • VG
    VALLEY GROWTH VENTURES LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IZ
    ISRAEL ZAMBRANO DBA LOS GALLOS (NORTH LIMA)
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youngstown Columbiana Assn of Realt

To help organize and self-regulate those who deal with real estate in the mahoning and columbiana county areas of ohio.

2
Greene County Historical Society

Preservation of arts, historic sites and public education

Arts & Culture
3
Oakwood Cemetery Association

To provide and operate a cemetery in warren, ohio.

4
Vicksburg-Warren County Historical Society

The organization's purpose is archival and display of historical artifacts in a museum that is open to the public.

Arts & Culture
5
The Columbus Botanical Gardens Inc

Maintenance and operation of a botanical garden for the education and betterment of the local community.

Environment
6
The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo I

To develop and promote arts in the greater toledo community

Arts & Culture
7
Wythe County Genealogical and Historical Association

To provide a library for and assist with genealogical research

Arts & Culture
8
Mahoning Valley Historical Society

To exhibit historical educational material

Arts & Culture
9
Tuscarawas County Agricultural Soc

The organization's mission is to educate and promote interest in agriculture, household arts, and livestock for residents of tuscarawas county ohio.

Recreation & Sports
10
Ohio Manufacturers' Association

To serve and promote the interests of ohio manufacturers.

11
Warren Redevelopment and Planning Corporation

Warren redevelopment is primarily concerned with area revitalization, mainly in downtown warren, ohio.

Community Improvement
12
Wayne County Historical Society of Ohio

The wayne county historical society is dedicated to collecting, preserving, and interpreting the history of wayne county.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youngstown Cityscape Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Health Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYoungstown Community Develo…Disability Services and Sup…Youngstown Regional Communi…Youth Sports & Activities B…Union Health & Welfare FundsMahoning Valley Community F…Animal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr12%4%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr11%20%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr21%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%4%5–10yr21%22%10–20yr11%21%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr21%25%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/606
the rest of the field
13%
261/1,957

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 610 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS — $1,710,271 · OtherVARIOUSWARREN COMMERCE PARK CORP — $299,906 · OtherWARREN COMMERCE PARK CORP+193 more — $2,580,313 · Other+193 moreTRUMBULL ART GALLERY — $19,069 · Arts & CultureWARREN CIVIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER ASSISTANCE & REFERRAL — $10,000 · HealthBRITE ENERGY INNOVATORS — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,590,490Arts & Culture$29,069Health$20,000Community Improvement$10,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUMBULL ART GALLERY — $19,069 over 2y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWARREN CIVIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetBRITE ENERGY INNOVATORS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAlliance of Transylvanian Saxons of US 30 — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FELLOWS RIVERSIDE GARDENS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetALZHEIMER ASSISTANCE & REFERRAL — $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Youngstown Fdn GeneralOH23.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Youngstown Fdn General · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · Premier Bank Foundation · The Warren Area Chamber of Commerce Education Civic & Cultural Foundation · Nancy Kaighin Van Fossan Family Foundation · J Ford Crandall Depository · Lariccia Family Foundation · Helene P Kaighin Charitable Tr Xxxxxxxxx · E M Barr Tw Charitable Trust · Zita M and Joseph Diyorio Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Valley Economic Development Partners Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 610 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph