Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lariccia Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$100kArts & Culture$80kHuman Services$27kAnimals$15kCommunity Improvement$13kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YSU FOUNDATION$50,000
STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS$14,000
THE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE$10,000
PLAYHOUSE SQUARE FOUNDATION$10,000
EDWINS FOUNDATION$10,000
SIMPLY SLAVIC$7,500
YOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE$5,000
OH WOW$5,000
BRITE CLEVELAND - BRITE WINTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%EDWINS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%EDWINS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$217k · 10 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$217k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +7%
  • SS
    SIMPLY SLAVIC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +136%
  • PS
    Playhouse Square Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AC
    ANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    ANIMAL CHARITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • EA
    EARTH ANGEL FARM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Downtown Arts Theater Inc

Throughout 2024, the organization engaged in renovating and restoring a state-of-the art venue for hosting movies and live events. we hope this venue contributes to the economic and cultural development of downtown wooster, wayne county,…

Arts & Culture
2
Know Theatre of Cincinnati

Know Theatre is a small professional theatre showcasing voices, new works, & plays that embrace the inherent theatricality of the live experience. Know Theatre seeks to be a place where artists and audiences feel welcome to take artistic…

Arts & Culture
3
Art Opportunities Inc

To create community driven public art and launch careers for youth and artists.

Arts & Culture
4
Bucks County Playhouse Theater Inc
Arts & Culture
5
The Falls of the Ohio Foundation

To inspire a sense of wonder in the falls of the ohio region through education, preservation, and exploration.

Environment
6
Theatre Y

Create connections between diverse artists seeking mutual growth through collaboration.

Arts & Culture
7
Shango Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
9
Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park

We are Cincinnati's national theater - committed to bringing diverse, engaging works of great artistry to our community, and to putting Cincinnati's artistic excellence in the national spotlight.

Arts & Culture
10
Civic Theatre of Allentown Pa

The mission: the theatre is dedicated to providing high-quality performing arts to enhance the quality of life in the lehigh valley community. civic carries out its mission by presenting affordable theatre, music and art-house cinema, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Sandusky State Theatre Inc

The sandusky state theatre was originally created in 1928 and was reinvented several times since its inception. the arts, particularly the performing arts, are a reflection and a documentation of our culture and society. therefore, in…

Arts & Culture
12
Players Club of Swarthmore

The Players Club of Swarthmore is an all-volunteer community theater committed to providing a welcoming environment that fosters training and development in the performing arts, artistic excellence and enriches the cultural life of the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youngstown Cityscape Inc and the most unlike its peers is Disabled American Veterans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YSU FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherYSU FOUNDATIONDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS — $12,000 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSANIMAL CHARITY — $5,000 · OtherEARTH ANGEL FARM INC — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $4,500 · OtherSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC — $19,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE …Playhouse Square Foundation — $15,000 · Arts & CulturePlayhouse Square Foundatio…THE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE — $12,500 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSEOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH — $10,000 · Arts & CultureOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA …SIMPLY SLAVIC — $18,500 · Community ImprovementSIMPLY SLAVICYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC — $13,000 · Community ImprovementYOUNGSTOWN CIT…EDWINS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC — $10,000 · Animals
Other$126,500Arts & Culture$56,500Community Improvement$31,500Human Services$15,000Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC — $19,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSIMPLY SLAVIC — $18,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDWINS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN CITYSCAPE INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE — $12,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Youngstown Fdn GeneralOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Youngstown Fdn General · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · J Ford Crandall Depository · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Valley Economic Development Partners Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lariccia Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph