· Private foundation
Lana Vento Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FDN OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS | $110,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF TAHOE TRUCKEE WALDORF | $75,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS | $58,800 |
| VIRGIN ISLANDS MONTESSORI INT'L ACA | $56,383 |
| SKY TAVERN | $30,000 |
| TRUCKEE ROUNDHOUSE | $25,000 |
| ADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE | $25,000 |
| CANCER SUPPORT VI INC | $20,000 |
| TAHOE RIM TRAIL ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| MY BROTHER'S WORKSHOP | $20,000 |
| INNERRHYTHMS INC | $3,500 |
| PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE | $2,564 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS9× · 2017–2025 · $547k · revenue +38%
- TTTHE TUMORI FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2024 · $482k · revenue ×14 · 73% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF TAHOE TRUCKEE WALDORF6× · 2019–2025 · $380k · revenue +207%
Funded once
- TFTAHOE FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +133%
- FOFRIENDS OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS NAT'Lone grant, 2017 · $20k
- STST THOMAS HISTORICAL TRUST INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +239% · 31% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…
To advance the natural history, conservation and ecosystem knowledge of the Tahoe region through science, education and outreach.
The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
The Sierra State Parks Foundation provides critically needed financial and professional support to the Lake Tahoe-Donner Sierra State Parks for Education, Restoration, and Cultural and Environmental Preservation in partnership with…
The truckee river watershed council was founded to implement locally developed public-private collaborative solutions to protect and improve water quality and biological resources for the sustainable environmental and economic health of…
A membership organization dedicated to developing, promoting, and serving your business and community. Our goal is to sustain a high quality of life by achieving economic vitality, with sensitivity and respect for the environment.
The tahoe truckee community foundation brings together trusted partners to align strategies and inspire philanthropy to nurture a resilient community and environment.
To plan, steward, interpret, promote, and sustain a system of four-season trails and public access to natural areas in the Mammoth Lakes and Eastern Sierra Nevada region in the state of California while protecting its natural resources.
At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.
Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Stewardship is creating and maintaining world-class trails responsibly, sustainably, and collectively.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Rim Trail Association and the most unlike its peers is The Tumori Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ↗
- Who funds THE TUMORI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TAHOE TRUCKEE WALDORF ↗
- Who funds Sky Tavern Inc ↗
- Who funds ANTILLES SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Tahoe Rim Trail Association ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds BIKING FOR A BETTER WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE ROUNDHOUSE ↗
- Who funds ST THOMAS SWIMMING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT VI INC ↗
- Who funds ST THOMAS HISTORICAL TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SIMMARON RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds Council on Foundations Inc ↗
- Who funds WYLIE ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INNERRHYTHMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Truckee Library Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW VINTAGE BAROQUE INC DBA MUSICA SIERRA ↗
- Who funds Nevada Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds Truckee Dirt Union ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation · Martis Camp Community Foundation Dba Martis Camp Foundation · Community Foundation of the Virgin Islands Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lana Vento Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lana Vento Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Lana Vento Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.