Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kuebler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$109kHealth$107kEnvironment$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kEducation$25kAnimals$20kPhilanthropy$20kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$990k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC$10,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC$7,000
MINDING YOUR MIND$5,000
THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC$5,000
CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC$5,000
CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION$4,000
FISH & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC$3,000
OCEAN REEF CHAPEL INC$3,000
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC$3,000
OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$2,000
OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC$1,000
OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$1,000
PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC$1,000
WILD DOLPHIN PROJECT INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $7k → 16%PHILABUNDANCE: $3k → 22%CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $6k → 14%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 13%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10k → 13%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%MERCY CORPS: $5k → 8%COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 9%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 9%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $6k → 16%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 13%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $8k → 13%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 9%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $6k → 16%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 13%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $8k → 13%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 9%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $6k → 16%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $8k → 13%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $6k → 16%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $8k → 13%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $6k → 16%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $7k → 13%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 16%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC: $5k → 13%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $6k → 13%CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC: $5k → 13%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $6k → 13%MINDING YOUR MIND: $5k → 10%THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC: $5k → 13%MINDING YOUR MIND: $5k → 10%MINDING YOUR MIND: $5k → 10%MINDING YOUR MIND: $5k → 10%MINDING YOUR MIND: $5k → 10%MINDING YOUR MIND: $5k → 10%MINDING YOUR MIND: $4k → 10%EAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 17 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +89% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$333k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+89%

Still filing today

94%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $61k · revenue +62%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +84%
  • MY
    MINDING YOUR MIND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +455%
  • EW
    EAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -97%
  • MC
    MERCY CORPS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
2
Reef Check Foundation

Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.

Environment
3
Clean Reefs
Environment
4
The Coral Reef Alliance

Our research has demonstrated that corals can adapt to the effects of environmental stressors if immediate threats are reduced and if we protect healthy, ecologically connected networks of reefs.

Environment
5
Global Coralition Inc

To scale coral reef restoration through a holistic model of art, science and community. we design marine regeneration hubs that consist of sculptural coral gardens and land-based coral farms. we aim to target local impacts on reefs while…

Environment
6
Reef Renewal Usa Inc

Reef renewal usa is renewing coral reefs for future generations in a rapidly changing world by producing and outplanting resilient corals of the future at an unprecedented scale.

Environment
7
Reef Renewal Foundation International

Our mission at reef renewal foundation international is to increase coral coverage and biodiversity worldwide by supporting our global network of reef restoration programs. reef renewal's network members are programs that are locally led…

Environment
8
Reefs Unknown Inc

To perform scientific research and educational outreach on the marine environments of sensitive and lesser known deep coral reefs, and implement outreach and education programs to increase awareness and understanding of these unusual…

Science & Tech
9
Marine Resources Council of East Florida Inc

The mission of the marine resources council (mrc) is to maintain and enhance the quality of marine systems for the economic, recreational, aesthetic, and environmental use for the people of florida

Environment
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
Reef Environmental Education Foundation

Reef environmental education foundation (reef) was established as a nonprofit organization in 1990. reef conserves marine environments worldwide. our mission is to protect biodiversity and ocean life by actively engaging and inspiring the…

Recreation & Sports
12
The Ocean Foundation

As the only community foundation for the ocean, The Ocean Foundation's 501(c)(3) mission is to improve global ocean health, climate resilience, and the blue economy. We create partnerships to connect people in the communities in which we…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is South Shore Peer Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $45,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $24,000 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITYTHE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC: $18,000 · OtherTHE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INCMERCY CORPS: $5,000 · OtherCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $6,000 · OtherEAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherANDREW RED HARRIS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · OtherANDREW RED HARRIS FOUNDATION INC+6 more: $12,500 · Other+6 moreMINDING YOUR MIND: $37,000 · HealthMINDING YOUR MINDCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCI…Jupiter Medical Center Inc: $14,000 · HealthJupiter Medical Center IncSouth Shore Peer Recovery Inc: $7,000 · HealthSouth Shore Peer Recovery …FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $61,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORI…Philabundance: $3,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL …OCEAN REEF CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN REEF…Reef Relief Inc: $6,000 · EnvironmentReef Relie…COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · Public BenefitFISH & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA I: $13,000 · AnimalsWild Dolphin Project Inc: $7,000 · AnimalsOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyJONATHANS LANDING CARES INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$123,500Health$86,000Food & Nutrition$64,000Environment$36,000Public Benefit$24,000Animals$20,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $61,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND: $37,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $28,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISH & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA I: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetJONATHANS LANDING CARES INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetANDREW RED HARRIS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWild Dolphin Project Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Shore Peer Recovery Inc: $7,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetReef Relief Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kuebler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kuebler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • South Shore Peer Recovery Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Fish & Wildlife Foundation of Florida I: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kuebler Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph