· Private foundation
Kuebler Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC | $10,000 |
| THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC | $7,000 |
| CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC | $5,000 |
| MINDING YOUR MIND | $5,000 |
| CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION | $4,000 |
| FISH & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC | $3,000 |
| OCEAN REEF CHAPEL INC | $3,000 |
| FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY | $3,000 |
| COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC | $3,000 |
| OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $2,000 |
| SOUTH SHORE PEER RECOVERY INC | $1,000 |
| OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC | $1,000 |
| WILD DOLPHIN PROJECT INC | $1,000 |
| OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +89% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC8× · 2018–2025 · $61k · revenue +62%
- GBGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC8× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +84%
- MYMINDING YOUR MIND8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +455%
- EWEAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -97%
- MCMERCY CORPSone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.
Our research has demonstrated that corals can adapt to the effects of environmental stressors if immediate threats are reduced and if we protect healthy, ecologically connected networks of reefs.
To scale coral reef restoration through a holistic model of art, science and community. we design marine regeneration hubs that consist of sculptural coral gardens and land-based coral farms. we aim to target local impacts on reefs while…
Reef renewal usa is renewing coral reefs for future generations in a rapidly changing world by producing and outplanting resilient corals of the future at an unprecedented scale.
Our mission at reef renewal foundation international is to increase coral coverage and biodiversity worldwide by supporting our global network of reef restoration programs. reef renewal's network members are programs that are locally led…
To perform scientific research and educational outreach on the marine environments of sensitive and lesser known deep coral reefs, and implement outreach and education programs to increase awareness and understanding of these unusual…
The mission of the marine resources council (mrc) is to maintain and enhance the quality of marine systems for the economic, recreational, aesthetic, and environmental use for the people of florida
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Reef environmental education foundation (reef) was established as a nonprofit organization in 1990. reef conserves marine environments worldwide. our mission is to protect biodiversity and ocean life by actively engaging and inspiring the…
As the only community foundation for the ocean, The Ocean Foundation's 501(c)(3) mission is to improve global ocean health, climate resilience, and the blue economy. We create partnerships to connect people in the communities in which we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is South Shore Peer Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds MINDING YOUR MIND ↗
- Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FISH & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA I ↗
- Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN REEF CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds JONATHANS LANDING CARES INC ↗
- Who funds ANDREW RED HARRIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wild Dolphin Project Inc ↗
- Who funds South Shore Peer Recovery Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds Reef Relief Inc ↗
- Who funds EAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BALDWIN SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kuebler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- South Shore Peer Recovery Inc — 71% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Jupiter Medical Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Fish & Wildlife Foundation of Florida I — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.