Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kristie Lee Tautenhahn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$72kHuman Services$35kHealth$27kHousing & Shelter$27kCrime & Legal$25kArts & Culture$20kCivil Rights$17kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$521k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN WORLD REFLIEF$6,000
MAGNIFICAT HOUSES INC$5,000
K9 WARRIORS$4,000
BAY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,500
GALLIEN LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
WOMENS HOME$3,000
SAFE SPACE$3,000
THE FOOD GROUP$3,000
CASA OF THE COASTAL BEND$2,000
ST JOSEPH CHURCH$2,000
SPECIAL HEARTS IN THE ARTS$2,000
HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$2,000
PAWS4PEOPLE FOUNDATION$1,500
BARARBA BUSH LIBRARY$1,500
SINTON PROBLEM SOLVERS ASSN$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $1k → 13%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 22%PAWS4PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 22%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 22%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 22%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 22%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 22%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 22%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%WOMENS HOME: $3k → 16%WOMENS HOME: $3k → 16%WOMENS HOME: $3k → 16%WOMENS HOME: $3k → 16%WOMENS HOME: $2k → 16%WOMENS HOME: $2k → 16%WOMENS HOME: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
IA
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
SC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$229k · 29 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
15

Total granted

$229k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+19%

Still filing today

34%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S HOME
    7× · 2018–2024 · $15k · revenue +94%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C
    7× · 2018–2024 · $13k · revenue +81%
  • VF
    Voices for Children Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • TL
    TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • LD
    LUTHERAN DISASTER RESPONSE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

2
Habitat for Humanity Inc

Habitat seeks to eliminate poverty housing from the world and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

3
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

4
Habitat for Humanity of Central Iowa Inc

Habitat for humanity of central iowa, inc. works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building houses, so that there are decent houses in decent…

5
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

7
Habitat for Humanity International Albany Area

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with people in need by building and renovating houses, so that there are decent houses in decent communities in which…

Housing & Shelter
8
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

9
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

10
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
11
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Miami Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater miami (hfhgm) is a christian ministry whose purpose is to build homes and communities in partnership with low-income families within greater miami.

Housing & Shelter
12
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Catherine Mcauley Center and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of the Ocean Cleanup Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Food Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr10%41%35–55yr13%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr10%32%35–55yr13%27%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,779

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN JOSE CLINIC — $24,000 · OtherSAN JOSE CLINICLUTHERAN WORLD REFLIEF — $18,000 · OtherLUTHERAN WORLD REFLIEFK9 WARRIORS — $16,000 · OtherK9 WARRIORSSAFE SPACE — $14,000 · OtherSAFE SPACEGALLIEN LUTHERAN CHURCH — $12,350 · OtherGALLIEN LUTHERAN CHURCHKINSMEN LUTHERAN CHURCH — $9,000 · OtherTRINITY OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH — $8,000 · OtherSO AMERICAN MISSION — $7,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES GAL HOUSTON — $7,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherBARARBA BUSH LIBRARY — $6,300 · Other+23 more — $56,000 · Other+23 moreTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $14,500 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S HOMEVoices for Children Inc — $12,000 · Human ServicesVoices for Child…HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY — $9,000 · Human ServicesHEART OF TEXAS F…PAWS4PEOPLE INC — $1,500 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C — $13,000 · Civil RightsLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $3,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,500 · InternationalTHE NETHERLAND-AMERICA FOUNDATION INC — $2,250 · InternationalFAITH IN PRACTICE — $1,500 · InternationalSPECIAL HEARTS IN THE ARTS — $7,000 · Arts & CultureMain Street Theater Houston — $2,000 · Arts & CultureMagnificat Houses Inc — $7,500 · HealthFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$185,150Human Services$38,000Civil Rights$13,000International$9,250Arts & Culture$9,000Health$7,500Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $14,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C — $13,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetVoices for Children Inc — $12,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY — $9,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMagnificat Houses Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL HEARTS IN THE ARTS — $7,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetBAY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - HOUSTON INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAvondale House Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NETHERLAND-AMERICA FOUNDATION INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMain Street Theater Houston — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS4PEOPLE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH IN PRACTICE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C
  • Who funds Voices for Children Inc
  • Who funds HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY
  • Who funds Magnificat Houses Inc
  • Who funds SPECIAL HEARTS IN THE ARTS
  • Who funds BAY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
  • Who funds Avondale House Inc
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE NETHERLAND-AMERICA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds Main Street Theater Houston
  • Who funds PAWS4PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds FAITH IN PRACTICE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX17.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kristie Lee Tautenhahn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kristie Lee Tautenhahn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kristie Lee Tautenhahn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph