How much did KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2020?

KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION reported 64 grants totaling $24,050 in its FY2020 IRS filing.

Where is KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION based?

KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION is based in CT.

KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$24k

Granted FY2020

Grants

Communities

$3k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2020 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

MITCHELL FARM EQUINE RETIREMENT$3,000
MITCHELL FARM EQUINE RETIREMENT$2,500
WILTON LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$2,300
KRISTINE MANN LIBRARY$1,000
WILTON COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN CANCER CTR$1,000
THIRTEEN PBS$500
FEEDING AMERICA$500
BLACK HILLS WILD HORSE SANCTUARY$500
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$500
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$500
STAY AT HOME IN WILTON INC$350
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$300
MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FDN$300
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$300

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Wilton Wildlife Preserve and Park Inc

Conservation of ecological systems and natural settings while providing environmental education and recreation.

Animals

Woodstock Land Conservancy

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment

Woodland Pond Inc

Operate a continuing care retirement community under article 46 of ny state public health law

Housing & Shelter

Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

To protect endangered species & preserve their natural habitats.

Animals

Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural and aesthetic environment and resources of Westchester County, eastern Putnam County and its environs.

Environment

Wnet

Wnet is a multi-media public service non-profit that delivers lifelong learning and meaningful experiences to our communities. our content inspires curiosity, encourages action and nurtures dreams.

Arts & Culture

Wildlands Trust Inc

Wildlands trust, inc. protects natural areas throughout southeastern massachusetts for the benefit of wildlife and people. we work to permanently protect and steward important habitats and landscapes that characterize the natural heritage…

Environment

Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare.

Animals

Women's Humane Society for the

To save the lives of animals and improve the health of pets

Animals

Food & Water Watch

Food & Nutrition

Worker Justice Center of New York Inc

Provides legal assistance to farmworkers and other low wage workers in New York State.

Crime & Legal

West Side Center for Community Life

To support community life through alleviation of hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access to healthy food and supportive services.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wilton Library Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York Public Radio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/29

the rest of the field

4,378/46,179

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/29

Grantees still filing

21/29

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$12,000Animals$6,300Education$2,500Human Services$1,500International$750Environment$500Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alexander Family Foundation IncCT20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alexander Family Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Dawn and Jeff Padovan Family Foundation · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Ge Foundation · Shames Family Foundation · Perakis Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MITCHELL FARM EQUINE RETIREMENT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 562495790 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MITCHELL FARM EQUINE RETIREMENT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Krasnow Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Krasnow Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Krasnow Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

KRASNOW FAMILY FOUNDATION

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Krasnow Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph