Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kohnken Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$284kFood & Nutrition$238kHealth$179kArts & Culture$150kHuman Services$76kEnvironment$66kHousing & Shelter$14kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $146k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLACEOF HOPE$20,000
THE WICK THEATER$20,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$20,000
FOOD BANK OF E ALABAMA$16,000
BOCA HELPING HANDS$15,000
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$15,000
A CHILDS HAVEN$10,000
MORIKAMI MUSEUM$10,000
CAMPERTOWN ACADEMY$10,000
FORT GREENE PARK CONSERVATORY$10,000
ARUNDAL RIVERS FEDERATION$7,500
LEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
THE LIGHT HOUSE$5,000
FRIENDS OF QUIET WATER PARK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PLACEOF HOPE: $20k → 11%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PLACEOF HOPE: $20k → 11%PLACEOF HOPE: $15k → 11%PLACEOF HOPE: $8k → 11%PLACEOF HOPE: $5k → 11%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
SC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 29 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
11

Total granted

$1.0M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+6%

Still filing today

52%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PLACE OF HOPE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +73%
  • AR
    ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +23%
  • BH
    BOCA HELPING HANDS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -7%
  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
2
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
4
Feed Iowa First

To combat food insecurity today and tomorrow by growing food and farmers.

Food & Nutrition
5
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Inc

The food bank purchases food and obtains donations of food from the united states department of agriculture, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, growers and community members for distribution to people in need in 25 counties and eight…

—
6
Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc)

Community gardening, land conservation and environmental education are the primary activities. the community gardening program assists in development and maintenance of gardens with materials and neighborhood outreach. the land program…

Environment
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
9
All Faiths Food Bank Inc

Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK OF E ALABAMA: $79,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF E ALABAMATHE WICK THEATER: $65,000 · OtherTHE WICK THEATERA Child's Haven Inc: $52,500 · OtherA Child's Haven IncMORIKAMI MUSEUM: $40,000 · OtherMORIKAMI MUSEUMBR REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherBR REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONLEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $37,500 · OtherLEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITIONFORT GREENE PARK CONSERVATORY: $35,500 · OtherFORT GREENE PARK CONSERVATORYMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA: $32,500 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICAE AL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $28,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY FONDATION: $23,500 · OtherANNE ARUNDEL FOOD BANK: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+14 more: $58,250 · Other+14 moreRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $151,500 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOU…AVERETT UNIVERSITY: $34,000 · EducationAVERETT UNIVERSITYCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC: $27,500 · EducationCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC+2 more: $3,500 · EducationHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $77,500 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE F…BOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $52,500 · Food & NutritionBOCA HELPING H…+1 more: $4,000 · Food & NutritionPLACE OF HOPE INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC: $54,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE REEDY RIVER INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterTEAM RUBICON INC: $8,750 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$554,750Education$216,500Food & Nutrition$134,000Human Services$83,000Environment$62,000Housing & Shelter$14,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $151,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $77,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC: $67,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC: $54,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc: $52,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $52,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $37,500 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetAVERETT UNIVERSITY: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE REEDY RIVER INC: $8,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetThe Friends of Quiet Waters Park Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE NOURISH FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARMORY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARUNDEL LODGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED & SEED CO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITY GARDENS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds AVERETT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE REEDY RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Friends of Quiet Waters Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NOURISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARMORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ARUNDEL LODGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED & SEED CO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hayne Hipp FoundationSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hayne Hipp Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kohnken Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kohnken Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Arundel Rivers Federation Inc: 19% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Lynn University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kohnken Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kohnken Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kohnken Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph