Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Culture of Life Foundation of Nebraska Inc

Support right to life initiatives.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CULTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $54,702 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $113,002 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $58,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$18,702
Median grant
1
States reached
$283k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE$26,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NE STATE CO$18,702
DIOCESE OF GRAND ISLAND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $27k → 16%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $55k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $42k → 12%IMMIGRATION LEGAL SERVICES: $5k → 13%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $21k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%NEBRASKA CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$653k · 13 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +115% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$653k
$322k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+25%

Still filing today

54%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $138k · revenue +161%
  • AW
    Assure Womens Center
    7× · 2017–2023 · $96k · revenue +115%
  • BH
    BETHLEHEM HOUSE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $52k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • B
    BEGINNINGS
    one grant, 2018 · $37k
  • SF
    SANCTA FAMILIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +46%
  • WP
    Wellspring Pregnancy Health Center Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $34k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
2
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
3
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

4
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

5
Birthchoice

Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.

6
Life Choices Resource Center Inc

To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.

7
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

8
Pregnancy Care Center of Lagrange Inc

Pregnancy care center of lagrange is a christ-centered ministry providing medical and educational services to those facing unplanned pregnancies, encouraging sexual integrity, and empowering individuals to make life affirming choices.

Health
9
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
10
St John Paul Ii Life Center

To provide natural integrated ob-gyn healthcare, fertilitycare, and pregnancy help services for all women while honoring life.

Health
11
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

12
Pregnancy Care Center

The pregnancy care center empowers individuals to make life-affirming decisions through education, medical services, counseling, and compassionate care based on the ministry of jesus christ.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethlehem House and the most unlike its peers is Hot Meals On Wheels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr19%32%35–55yr19%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr15%8%20–35yr19%42%35–55yr19%42%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
9%
597/6,740

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE — $149,000 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCEBETHLEHEM HOUSE — $52,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC — $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INCBEGINNINGS — $36,850 · OtherBEGINNINGSKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEBRASKA STATE COUNCIL — $36,322 · OtherKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEBRASKA STATE COUNCILCHANCERY OFFICE OF DIOCESE OF GRAND ISLAND — $34,500 · OtherCHANCERY OFFICE OF DIOCESE OF GRAND ISLANDWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER — $25,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE — $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $19,000 · Other+13 more — $108,125 · Other+13 moreAssure Womens Center — $95,997 · HealthAssure Womens CenterSANCTA FAMILIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC — $34,550 · HealthSANCTA FAMILIA MEDICAL ASS…Wellspring Pregnancy Health Center Inc — $34,240 · HealthWellspring Pregnancy Healt…COLLAGE CENTER — $33,412 · HealthCOLLAGE CENTERPREGNANCY CENTER INC — $33,320 · HealthPREGNANCY CENTER INCEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $137,974 · Human ServicesEPS ESSENTIAL PREGN…OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER — $27,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS PREGNANCY C…+2 more — $10,125 · Human Services+2 moreTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY — $26,600 · Crime & LegalLincoln Community Foundation Inc — $26,000 · PhilanthropyCreighton University — $11,250 · EducationNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$524,797Health$231,519Human Services$175,099Crime & Legal$26,600Philanthropy$26,000Education$11,250Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $137,974 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetAssure Womens Center — $95,997 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE — $52,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEBRASKA STATE COUNCIL — $36,322 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetSANCTA FAMILIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC — $34,550 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWellspring Pregnancy Health Center Inc — $34,240 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCOLLAGE CENTER — $33,412 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER INC — $33,320 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetOPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER — $27,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY — $26,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE — $24,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCreighton University — $11,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA RIGHT TO LIFE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC — $5,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Assure Womens Center
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HOUSE
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEBRASKA STATE COUNCIL
  • Who funds SANCTA FAMILIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
  • Who funds Wellspring Pregnancy Health Center Inc
  • Who funds COLLAGE CENTER
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER INC
  • Who funds OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Lincoln Community Foundation Inc
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE
  • Who funds Creighton University
  • Who funds HOT MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds NEBRASKA RIGHT TO LIFE INC
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hirschfeld Family Foundation IncNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hirschfeld Family Foundation Inc · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Culture of Life Foundation of Nebraska Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Knights of Columbus Culture of Life Foundation of Nebraska Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus Culture of Life Foundation of Nebraska Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph