Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kleinman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$656kHuman Services$235kEducation$185kPhilanthropy$150kInternational$70kEnvironment$50kEmployment$10kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTH$75,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC$50,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$25,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTH$25,000
LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $295k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $50k → 20%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $35k → 20%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $25k → 20%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $15k → 20%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $5k → 20%TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $25k → 17%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $5k → 20%TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $25k → 17%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $75k → 20%TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$1.2M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-4%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    White Plains Hospital Medical Center
    3× · 2018–2021 · $385k · revenue +71%
  • JC
    JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +4%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE SCARSDALE LIBRARY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -80%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOPE CHEST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -61%
  • FA
    FUTURES AND OPTIONS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Solving Kids' Cancer Inc

Skc impacts children through the initiation of clinical research trials of investigative treatment strategies. our vision is to continue expanding the armamentarium of effective and less toxic treartment strategies for pediatric…

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
6
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
7
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
8
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Child Care Association of New York; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Hope Chest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

White Plains Hospital Medical Center: $385,000 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical CenterCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $225,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INCLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $220,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCI…THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INCUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH …THE CHILDREN'S HOPE CHEST INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S…PRATHAM USA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USAFRIENDS OF THE SCARSDALE LIBRARY INC: $100,000 · EducationFRIENDS O…FUTURES AND OPTIONS INC: $10,000 · EducationFUTURES A…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $70,000 · InternationalTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,000 · OtherMiami Children's Health System Foundation Inc: $5,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD: $5,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$645,000Human Services$295,000Philanthropy$175,000Education$110,000International$70,000Other$65,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $385,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $225,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $220,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SCARSDALE LIBRARY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOPE CHEST INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetFUTURES AND OPTIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiami Children's Health System Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Express Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kleinman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kleinman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kleinman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kleinman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kleinman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph