Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kinney Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$536k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$697kEducation$656kInternational$268kHousing & Shelter$260kHealth$185kCommunity Improvement$151kRecreation & Sports$142kCivil Rights$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $466k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$50,627
ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY$33,000
NEIGHBOORHOOD HOUSE$30,490
TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$28,368
CAMP ODAYIN$28,000
NPH-USA$27,000
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$25,000
EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER$25,000
MULTICULTURAL SCHOOL FOR EMPOWERMEN$25,000
BRIDGING$25,000
KEYSTONE COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,600
MAHTOMEDI AREA EDUCATIONAL FDTN$20,200
RIVER VALLEY RIDERS$20,000
FACE TO FACE ACADEMY$20,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP ODAYIN: $28k → 6%CAMP ODAYIN: $28k → 6%CAMP ODAYIN: $28k → 6%CAMP ODAYIN: $28k → 6%CAMP ODAYIN: $28k → 6%EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 14%NPH-USA: $27k → 11%EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 14%NPH-USA: $25k → 11%EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 14%NPH-USA: $25k → 11%EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 14%NPH-USA: $25k → 11%EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 14%NPH-USA: $25k → 11%BRIDGING: $25k → 11%BRIDGING: $25k → 11%BRIDGING: $25k → 11%BRIDGING: $25k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $55k → 11%NEIGHBOORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $54k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $54k → 11%NEIGHBOORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $54k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $51k → 11%NEIGHBOORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $25k → 14%NEIGHBOORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $25k → 14%NEIGHBOORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $28k → 14%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27k → 14%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27k → 14%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27k → 14%TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25k → 14%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $33k → 14%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $33k → 14%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $33k → 14%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%SEE SCHEDULE ATTACHED: $533k → 14%MULTICULTURAL SCHOOL FOR EMPOWERMEN: $25k → 14%MULTICULTURAL SCHOOL FOR EMPOWERMEN: $25k → 14%MULTICULTURAL SCHOOL FOR EMPOWERMEN: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 45 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
21

Total granted

$2.6M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+20%

Still filing today

69%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationEmploymentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CAMP ODAYIN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $140k · revenue +89%
  • TC
    TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $135k · revenue +33%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $127k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AC
    ASCENSION CATHOLIC ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
6
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
7
The Carter Center Inc

Mission description the carter center is guided by the principles of our founders, jimmy and rosalynn carter. founded, in partnership with emory university, on a fundamental commitment to human rights and the alleviation of human…

International
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Avivo

Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.

Human Services
12
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jordan Pride Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
35/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $267,084 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $134,875 · OtherTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITYMULTICULTURAL SCHOOL FOR EMPOWERMEN: $125,000 · OtherMULTICULTURAL SCHOOL FOR EMPOWERMENCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $125,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETYBridging Inc: $124,893 · OtherBridging IncKeystone Community Services: $103,000 · OtherKeystone Community ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAHTOMEDI AREA EDUCATIONAL FDTN: $98,500 · OtherMAHTOMEDI AREA EDUCATIONAL FDTNST MARY'S SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY: $60,000 · Other+29 more: $222,205 · Other+29 moreST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $159,000 · EducationST CATHERINE UNIV…EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $125,000 · EducationEAST SIDE LEARNIN…FACE TO FACE ACADEMY: $100,000 · EducationFACE TO FACE ACAD…CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $33,100 · EducationCENTER FOR WORKIN…+5 more: $4,600 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $127,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $75,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER …ALIGHT: $34,000 · InternationalALIGHTMercy Corps: $10,000 · International+6 more: $23,800 · International+6 moreRIVER VALLEY RIDERS: $95,000 · HealthWashburn Center for Children: $60,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation: $8,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 · Health+7 more: $16,528 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $150,598 · Community ImprovementCAMP ODAYIN: $140,000 · Recreation & SportsJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,435,557Education$421,700International$269,800Health$186,328Community Improvement$150,598Recreation & Sports$140,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $159,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $150,598 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP ODAYIN: $140,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $134,875 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $127,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER: $125,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetBridging Inc: $124,893 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKeystone Community Services: $103,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFACE TO FACE ACADEMY: $100,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER VALLEY RIDERS: $95,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWashburn Center for Children: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY: $60,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetALIGHT: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $33,100 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetThe Lift Garage: $26,605 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAT HOME GROUP: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Breath of Hope Lung Foundation: $4,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLUMINARIAS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILE IN MY SHOES: $3,628 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $3,140 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTUBMAN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA JAZZ CONSERVATORY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSENITIZO: $1,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE CHILD INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJORDAN PRIDE BOOSTER CLUB: $800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetARNOLD S LEONARD CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlory Reborn Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEARNING ATRIUM INC: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ODAYIN ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
  • Who funds EAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Bridging Inc ↗
  • Who funds Keystone Community Services ↗
  • Who funds FACE TO FACE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds RIVER VALLEY RIDERS ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Lift Garage ↗
  • Who funds AT HOME GROUP ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds A Breath of Hope Lung Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LUMINARIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUDAN RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fastbreak Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kinney Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kinney Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kinney Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kinney Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kinney Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph