Skip to content
Kiltz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kiltz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$442k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Employment$152kInternational$104kHuman Services$50kCommunity Improvement$50kReligion$47kHealth$45kEducation$43kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$934k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL$150,000
PRAXIS INC$50,000
EVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE$50,000
DASH NETWORK$50,000
HIS GRACE FOUNDATION$30,000
SCHOLARS IN FINANCE$25,000
ONE CHALLENGE INT'L INC$25,000
SIM USA$19,000
HARBOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$18,000
SEND RELIEF$15,000
OAKS COUNSELING INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL: $150k → 6%HIS GRACE FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%Brookwood in Georgetown: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CO
VA
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 3 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +404% since the first grant, against +101% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$237k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+404%
+101%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $152k · revenue +39%
  • DA
    DFW ASYLUM SEEKER HOUSING NETWORK
    2× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +404%
  • SU
    SIM USA INCORPORATED
    2× · 2020–2025 · $25k

Funded once

  • AS
    Adaptive Sports Center of Crested B
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AI
    AFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • OB
    Oh Be Joyful Church
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
4
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
5
Grace Ministries Inc

Grace Ministries exists to provide gracious Christian counseling, family ministry, executive coaching, and biblical encouragement to the public via counseling, pastoral care, all sacerdotal ministry duties, hosptial patient care advocacy,…

Human Services
6
The Center for Integrative Counseling and Psychology

Our mission is to provide accessible high-quality counseling, training, psychological evaluations, and educational testing that equip our clients to grow through lifes changes and challenges.

Health
7
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
8
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Oasis Counseling International

To provide to the general public the following services: 1) Individual Psychological Counseling, 2) Play therapy for children, 3)Marriage Counseling, 4) Psychological Evaluations, 5)Financial Counseling, 6)Career Counseling, 7)psychiatric,…

Religion
11
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
12
Crosspointe Biblical Counseling Ctr

Provide biblical counseling to those that are in need (distressed) and for the advancement of religion

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholars of Finance; the most unlike its peers is Oaks Counseling Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $152,000 · Human ServicesBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INCHis Grace Foundation: $30,000 · Human ServicesHis Grace FoundationSIM USA INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATEDONE CHALLENGE INT'L INC: $25,000 · OtherONE CHALLENGE INT'L INCSEND RELIEF: $15,000 · OtherSEND RELIEFAdaptive Sports Center of Crested B: $10,000 · OtherAdaptive Sports Center …AFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $10,000 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSION I…Oh Be Joyful Church: $10,000 · OtherOh Be Joyful ChurchANTIOCH GEORGETOWN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherANTIOCH GEORGETOWN CHUR…+1 more: $2,000 · OtherPraxis Inc: $50,000 · ReligionPraxis IncEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC: $50,000 · ReligionEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCAT…DFW ASYLUM SEEKER HOUSING NETWORK: $60,000 · InternationalDFW ASYLUM SE…SCHOLARS OF FINANCE: $25,000 · EducationSCHOLARS …Harbor Christian Academy: $18,000 · EducationHarbor Ch…OAKS COUNSELING INC: $10,000 · HealthROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$182,000Other$107,000Religion$100,000International$60,000Education$43,000Health$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $152,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetDFW ASYLUM SEEKER HOUSING NETWORK: $60,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPraxis Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHarbor Christian Academy: $18,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOAKS COUNSELING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENTRUST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Greater Houston Commu…Vanguard Charitable E…Renaissance Charitabl…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiltz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiltz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiltz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home