Skip to content

· Private foundation

Khaki Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$946k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.6MEducation$1.7MInternational$764kHuman Services$655kHealth$320kPublic Safety & Disaster$270kFood & Nutrition$123kCivil Rights$116kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $339k
  • $250k+1 grant · $946k
$126,891
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ITHNA-ASHERI MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST$945,697
FAMILY EDUCATION SERVICES FOUNDATION$140,823
Individual grant recipient$126,891
IQRA FUND$71,061
NYOTA FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 58% of grant dollars ($3.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 42% that went abroad ($2.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEALTH TANZANIA FOUNDATION: $35k → 7%HEALTH TANZANIA FOUNDATION: $35k → 7%EASTSIDE FRIENDS OF SENIORS: $10k → 9%EASTSIDE FRIENDS OF SENIORS: $10k → 9%EASTSIDE FRIENDS OF SENIORS: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 42% of all-years giving ($2.8M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$1.1M · 18 grants
Pakistan$634k · 7 grants
Tanzania$486k · 26 grants
Canada$458k · 3 grants
India$185k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 17 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$5.9M
$738k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+137%

Still filing today

41%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    ITHNA-ASHERI MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.6M
  • FE
    FAMILY EDUCATION SERVICES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $522k
  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $464k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • BF
    BW FOUNDATION-SALAAM CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $131k
  • FE
    FRIENDS' EDUCATIONAL & MEDICAL TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • JF
    JUSTICE FOR ALL
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Advocates for Human Rights

To promote and protect human rights in the United States and around the world.

International
2
Ensaaf

Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…

International
3
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
4
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
5
Teach for Bangladesh

Teach of bangladesh is an exempt organization to support its counter part teach of bangladesh in bangladesh to launch a movemewnt of capable, committed and compassionate leaders in bangladesh who share an understanding of inequity and are…

Education
6
Human Rights for Kids

Human Rights for Kids is an international non-profit organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights for children. We use an integrated, multi-faceted approach which consists of research & public education, coalition…

International
7
Raheem Ai Dba Community Response Works

Raheem is a team of abolitionist organizers and technologists working to make community crisis care accessible to every person living in the U.S.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
9
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
10
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
11
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
12
The Humanity Share Inc

The Humanity Share works hand in hand with East African communities to break cycles of poverty and build sustainable, equitable futures.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iqra Fund; the most unlike its peers is Eastside Friends of Seniors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ITHNA-ASHERI MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST: $2,605,871 · OtherITHNA-ASHERI MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWESTFAMILY EDUCATION SERVICES FOUNDATION: $521,627 · OtherFAMILY EDUCATION SERVICES FOUNDATIONAL-KAWTHAR FOUNDATION: $446,087 · OtherAL-KAWTHAR FOUNDATIONTHE LADY FATEMAH CHARITABLE TRUST: $433,006 · OtherTHE LADY FATEMAH CHARITABLE TRUSTWIPAHS: $355,685 · OtherWIPAHSAL MAHDI INSTITUTE: $239,470 · Other+23 more: $1,031,094 · Other+23 morePRATHAM USA: $463,756 · PhilanthropyDEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FOUNDATION: $284,537 · Public Safety & DisasterIQRA Fund: $123,222 · InternationalJUSTICE FOR ALL: $100,000 · Civil RightsMUSLIM ADVOCATES: $16,200 · Civil RightsHealth Tanzania Foundation: $70,600 · Human ServicesEASTSIDE FRIENDS OF SENIORS: $30,000 · Human ServicesBELONG Partners: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,632,840Philanthropy$463,756Public Safety & Disaster$284,537International$123,222Civil Rights$116,200Human Services$100,600Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATHAM USA: $463,756 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FOUNDATION: $284,537 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetIQRA Fund: $123,222 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL: $100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetHealth Tanzania Foundation: $70,600 over 2y, 44% of budgetBELONG Partners: $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $43,538 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM ADVOCATES: $16,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAL ESCAPE FROM THE SEX TRADE: $9,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IQRA Fund ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds Health Tanzania Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BELONG Partners ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE FRIENDS OF SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds REAL ESCAPE FROM THE SEX TRADE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Khaki Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Khaki Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Khaki’s filings →

    More from the funding graph