Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Kershaw's Challenge

KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE mission is to provide funds and other assistance to build schools and orphanages in the town of lusaka in the country of zambia and to provide support for other organizations in the united states.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
40%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$175,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$320,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 10
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$419k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 40% of the organizations Kershaw's Challenge funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $835k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$2.2M9%
FY202310$2.5M40%
FY20227$2.5M14%
FY20216$2.0M0%
FY20207$1.7M14%
FY20198$2.0M50%
FY20186$1.6M67%
FY20174$1.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$8.3MHuman Services$2.5MHealth$1.6MYouth Development$1.1MEducation$970kRecreation & Sports$800kHousing & Shelter$558kCrime & Legal$150kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Arise Africa Inc$2,773,000831%
International Justice Mission$2,245,00071%
Both Ends Believing Inc$2,095,000629%
Dream Center Foundation$1,885,26782%
Behind Every Door Ministries Inc$1,470,268430%
Shoes That Fit$995,113411%
The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation$800,00044%
For Oak Cliff$700,000313%
Bonton Enterprises$520,00025%
For the Nations Refugee Outreach$410,00027%
Show all 19 grantees
All grantees of Kershaw's Challenge by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Arise Africa Inc$2,773,000831%
International Justice Mission$2,245,00071%
Both Ends Believing Inc$2,095,000629%
Dream Center Foundation$1,885,26782%
Behind Every Door Ministries Inc$1,470,268430%
Shoes That Fit$995,113411%
The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation$800,00044%
For Oak Cliff$700,000313%
Bonton Enterprises$520,00025%
For the Nations Refugee Outreach$410,00027%
Interfaith Family Services$340,000112%
Cure International Inc$332,50011%
Hope Walks Inc$290,00024%
Connecting Point of Park Cities$250,000161%
Our Calling$225,0001n/a
West Dallas Community School Foundation$200,000184%
Action in Africa Inc$175,000112%
New Friends New Life$150,00014%
Just Keep Livin Foundation$60,00021%

Where it is load-bearing

Kershaw's Challenge supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 18 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetArise Africa Inc: $2,773,000 over 8y, 31% of budgetInternational Justice Mission: $2,245,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetBoth Ends Believing Inc: $2,095,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetDream Center Foundation: $1,885,267 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBehind Every Door Ministries Inc: $1,470,268 over 4y, 30% of budgetShoes That Fit: $995,113 over 4y, 11% of budgetThe Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation: $800,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetFor Oak Cliff: $700,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetBonton Enterprises: $520,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetFor the Nations Refugee Outreach: $410,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetInterfaith Family Services: $340,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCure International Inc: $332,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHope Walks Inc: $290,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetConnecting Point of Park Cities: $250,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetWest Dallas Community School Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 84% of budgetAction in Africa Inc: $175,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNew Friends New Life: $150,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetJust Keep Livin Foundation: $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kershaw FoundationTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kershaw Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dallas Alumnae Association of Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation Inc · Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Hillcrest Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kershaw's Challenge with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kershaw's Challenge?

Find your warmest path to Kershaw's Challenge through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Kershaw's Challenge

How much does Kershaw's Challenge give?
Kershaw's Challenge reported 11 grants totaling $2,205,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Kershaw's Challenge fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are International (52%), Human Services (15%), Health (10%).
Who are Kershaw's Challenge's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Arise Africa Inc ($2.8M), International Justice Mission ($2.2M), Both Ends Believing Inc ($2.1M).
Does Kershaw's Challenge fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 40% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kershaw's Challenge?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Kershaw Foundation, Communities Foundation of Texas Inc, The Dallas Foundation.
Where is Kershaw's Challenge based?
Kershaw's Challenge is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kershaw's Challenge’s filings →

More from the funding graph