Which funders back the same organizations as Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc, The Kentucky Bar Foundation Inc, Roaring Brook Foundation Inc.

Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky

Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky

Q: What does Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (70%), Health (16%), Education (8%).

Q: Who are Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky ($413k), Center for Women Children and Families Inc ($382k), Family Enrichment Center Inc ($382k).

Q: Does Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

To prevent the abuse and neglect of kentucky's children.

$342k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$53k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.2MHealth$520kEducation$247kCrime & Legal$184kArts & Culture$9k

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k3 grants · $23k
$10k–50k11 grants · $266k
$50k–250k1 grant · $53k

$11,747

Median grant

States reached

$2.8M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES	$52,992
FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF KENTUCKY	$48,000
FAMILY ENRICHMENT CENTER	$45,000
HOME OF THE INNOCENTS	$39,100
LKLP COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL	$32,130
HARLAN INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS	$23,556
CUMBERLAND RIVER MENTAL HEALTH	$23,537
BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP	$11,747
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER	$11,000
LAKE CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC	$10,977
TODD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT	$10,785
VARIOUS OTHER 5000 OR LESS	$10,005
CHRYSALIS HOUSE	$9,763
CAFCA CARES INC	$6,547
REGIONAL PREVENTION CENTER OF COMPREHEND INC	$6,528

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $587k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$3.0M · 24 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.0M

$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

+54%

Still filing today

54%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FN
Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky
9× · 2017–2025 · $413k · revenue +91%
CF
CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +148%
FE
FAMILY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +79%

Funded once

KS
KENTUCKY SAFETY AND PREVENTION ALIGNMENT NETWORK
one grant, 2023 · $40k
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2017 · $31k
RV
RAPE VICTIM SERVICES INC
one grant, 2021 · $24k · revenue -7%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—

Northern Kentucky Children's Advocacy Center Inc

Provide a coordinated response to concerns of child abuse in a child-focused environment, offering prevention, evaluation and treatment to children and families.

Health

Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal

Childrens Center

The mission of childrens center is to support and medically assess children who are suspected victims of abuse or neglect.

Crime & Legal

Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services

House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services

Active Community Health Center of Broward Inc

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

—

Safe Spot Child Advocacy Center of Wilkes

To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…

Youth Development

Childrens Crisis Center of Stanislaus County

Child abuse prevention

Crime & Legal

Mountain Child Advocacy Center Inc

The mission of the Mountain Child Advocacy Center is to prevent harm, protect children and heal families through best practice programs and community collaboration.

—

Iris Family Support Center Inc

Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

Human Services

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Advocacy Center of the Bluegrass Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lexington Leadership Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

15/22

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,475,347Crime & Legal$764,624Human Services$586,625Health$373,348Arts & Culture$9,111

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels IncKY27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Kentucky Bar Foundation Inc · Roaring Brook Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home