· Public charity
Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky
To prevent the abuse and neglect of kentucky's children.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of KENTUCKY COUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE D/B/A PREVENT CHILD ABUSE KENTUCKY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $266k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $52,992 |
| FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF KENTUCKY | $48,000 |
| FAMILY ENRICHMENT CENTER | $45,000 |
| HOME OF THE INNOCENTS | $39,100 |
| LKLP COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL | $32,130 |
| HARLAN INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS | $23,556 |
| CUMBERLAND RIVER MENTAL HEALTH | $23,537 |
| BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP | $11,747 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $11,000 |
| LAKE CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC | $10,977 |
| TODD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $10,785 |
| VARIOUS OTHER 5000 OR LESS | $10,005 |
| CHRYSALIS HOUSE | $9,763 |
| CAFCA CARES INC | $6,547 |
| REGIONAL PREVENTION CENTER OF COMPREHEND INC | $6,528 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $587k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +54% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FNFamily Nurturing Center of Kentucky9× · 2017–2025 · $413k · revenue +91%
- CFCENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +148%
- FEFAMILY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- KSKENTUCKY SAFETY AND PREVENTION ALIGNMENT NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $40k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $31k
- RVRAPE VICTIM SERVICES INCone grant, 2021 · $24k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
Provide a coordinated response to concerns of child abuse in a child-focused environment, offering prevention, evaluation and treatment to children and families.
To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.
The mission of childrens center is to support and medically assess children who are suspected victims of abuse or neglect.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…
We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…
To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…
Child abuse prevention
The mission of the Mountain Child Advocacy Center is to prevent harm, protect children and heal families through best practice programs and community collaboration.
Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Advocacy Center of the Bluegrass Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lexington Leadership Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
- Who funds LESLIE KNOTT LETCHER PERRY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CUMBERLAND RIVER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds FRANKFORT AREA CHILDREN'S COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RAPE VICTIM SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN AWARE INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds LICKING VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CAFCA Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds COMPREHEND INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY PARTNERSHIP FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Kentucky Bar Foundation Inc · Roaring Brook Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kentucky Council on Child Abuse D/B/A Prevent Child Abuse Kentucky funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.