Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth and Loretta Schatz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$287kPhilanthropy$280kInternational$223kEducation$81kReligion$72kFood & Nutrition$56kHuman Services$47kYouth Development$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,936
Median grant
6
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCFS$50,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$30,000
COLEL CHABAD$25,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPI$10,500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$10,000
SANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FND$10,000
AFMDA$10,000
HEADSTRONG$10,000
FOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY$6,750
KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$5,000
VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
CHABAD$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
MISSION MSA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $8k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $4k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $3k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $3k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $3k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $1k → 12%FAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE: $1k → 7%FAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE: $1k → 7%FAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$887k · 51 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
44

Total granted

$887k
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+22%

Still filing today

41%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COOPER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $59k · revenue +1%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +198%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $29k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR SURGICAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +253%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
2
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
3
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
4
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
5
The Joseph Kellman Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Jewish Fertility Foundation Inc

The jewish fertility foundation (jff) engages hopeful parents by providing financial assistance, emotional support, and infertility education to those struggling to build their families.

Health
7
Jewish Life Foundation
—
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blsj Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
28/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JCFS: $255,000 · OtherJCFSABRAMSON CANCER CENTER: $60,000 · OtherABRAMSON CANCER CENTERTHE COOPER FOUNDATION INC: $59,000 · OtherTHE COOPER FOUNDATION INCFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $29,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $27,500 · Other+83 more: $349,303 · Other+83 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $172,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $40,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF …FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY: $25,300 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 · EducationLARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL: $14,500 · EducationARVF CORPORATION THE ALICIA ROSE VICTORIOUS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationGLOUCESTER COUNTY HERO SCHOLARSHIP 200 CLUB INC: $4,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $36,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · HealthVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyPIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyRAVITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBLSJ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropySUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $22,250 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $5,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $7,250 · Religion
Other$809,053International$223,500Education$72,300Health$53,500Philanthropy$53,000Human Services$30,750Religion$7,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $172,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COOPER FOUNDATION INC: $59,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $29,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY: $25,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $22,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $18,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL: $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $7,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetARVF CORPORATION THE ALICIA ROSE VICTORIOUS FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRAVITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBLSJ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetGLOUCESTER COUNTY HERO SCHOLARSHIP 200 CLUB INC: $4,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetFAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLSJ SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPHS CARPENTER SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STARTING POINT INC OF NEW JERSEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURLINGTON COUNTY MILITARY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINSPIRING LIFE TOGETHER: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Enforcement Legal Defense Fund: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COOPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION ↗
  • Who funds LARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARVF CORPORATION THE ALICIA ROSE VICTORIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ravitz Family FoundationNJ26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ravitz Family Foundation · William G Rohrer Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Domenica Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Marvin Samson Foundation · Jeffrey and Tracy Brown Foundation · The Manny and Ruthy Cohen Foundation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth and Loretta Schatz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth and Loretta Schatz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Center for Family Services: 73% of income from government
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Arc of Camden County Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kenneth and Loretta Schatz’s filings →

More from the funding graph