Skip to content
Kenilworth Community Fund Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kenilworth Community Fund Inc

The kenilworth community fund pools amounts collected annually from kenilworth citizens who wish to give back to their community.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$413kHealth$292kRecreation & Sports$80kEducation$67kFood & Nutrition$48kHousing & Shelter$37kYouth Development$33kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $120,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $142,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER$19,000
FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE$18,000
JOSSELYN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH$15,500
HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$14,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD$10,000
NORTHERN SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION FOUNDATION$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$9,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$9,000
FAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE$8,500
OUR PLACE OF NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $413k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $19k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $19k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $18k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $9k → 14%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $8k → 14%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $8k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $18k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $18k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $16k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $16k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $16k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $16k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $16k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE: $16k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$969k · 14 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$969k
$10k

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +38%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $132k · revenue +78%
  • TJ
    THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE KENILWORTH CLUB INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Counseling Services of No Il

To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive

Human Services
2
North Shore Auxiliary of Jewish Child and Family Services

North Shore Auxiliary has served to support the comprehensive spectrum of services provided by Jewish Child & Family Services (JCFS). JCFS' pioneering programs are designed to enable individuals, children, and families to grow and develop…

Human Services
3
Family Service of Glencoe

We help individuals, families, and organizations thrive by providing social and mental health services to members of the Glencoe and surrounding communities.

Human Services
4
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
5
Family Service Association of Greater Elgin Area

Family Service Association of Greater Elgin Area is dedicated to empowering individuals and families, promoting self sufficiency and building stronger communities through quality, accessible client centered services.

—
6
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
7
North Central Mental Health Services Inc

To provide mental health and drug addiction services.

Health
8
Northshore Senior Center

Northshore senior center (nsc) was incorporated as a washington nonprofit corporation. nsc's mission is to provide a community where everyone leads full, healthy and inspired lives. nsc offers a wide variety of programs and services to…

Human Services
9
Northwest Community Center

To enrich the quality of life within the diverse population of northwest rockford.

—
10
Thrive Counseling Center

Our mission is to provide community-centered mental health services that empower individuals and families to build resilience and lead lives filled with meaning, connection, and hope.

Health
11
Northern Family Intervention Services Inc

To provide in-home and in-school intervention, treatment and crisis counseling to youth and families in northern michigan and to assure that children are safe in their homes.

—
12
Grand Prairie Services Llc

The provision of holistic emotional and behavioral health services for individuals, families and communities with an emphasis on recovery and optimal functioning.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Shore Senior Center; the most unlike its peers is Winnetka Youth Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $157,100 · Human ServicesNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTERTHE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH: $132,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW …HAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesHAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCST MARYS SERVICES: $23,500 · Human ServicesST MARYS SERVICESTHE ALLIANCE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD: $67,000 · OtherTHE ALLIANCE FOR EARLY CHILDHOODNAMI COOK COUNTY NORTH SUBURBAN: $64,000 · OtherNAMI COOK COUNTY NORTH SUBURBANMEALS AT HOME: $47,500 · OtherMEALS AT HOMEEPILEPSY SERVICES FOR NORTHEASTERN IL: $41,000 · OtherEPILEPSY SERVICES FOR NORTHEASTERN…FAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE: $37,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHOREWINNETKA YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $33,000 · OtherWINNETKA YOUTH ORGANIZATIONFRIENDS OF THE KENILWORTH CLUB INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $123,000 · HealthTHE JOSSELYN CENTER N…OUR PLACE OF NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP: $40,500 · HealthOUR PLACE OF NEW TRIE…Samaritan Interfaith Counseling Center: $23,500 · HealthSamaritan Interfaith …NSSRA FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsNSSRA FOU…
Human Services$412,600Other$299,500Health$187,000Recreation & Sports$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $157,100 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH: $132,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $123,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetNSSRA FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD: $67,000 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetNAMI COOK COUNTY NORTH SUBURBAN: $64,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetMEALS AT HOME: $47,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetEPILEPSY SERVICES FOR NORTHEASTERN IL: $41,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetOUR PLACE OF NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP: $40,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE: $37,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWINNETKA YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $33,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetSamaritan Interfaith Counseling Center: $23,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST MARYS SERVICES: $23,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NSSRA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD ↗
  • Who funds NAMI COOK COUNTY NORTH SUBURBAN ↗
  • Who funds MEALS AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY SERVICES FOR NORTHEASTERN IL ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE OF NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE ↗
  • Who funds WINNETKA YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Interfaith Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George M Eisenberg Fo…Evanston Community Fo…The Chicago Community…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
George M Eisenberg Foundation for CharitiesIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Evanston Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenilworth Community Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenilworth Community Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenilworth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home