Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Keller Kingsberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$56kHealth$50kHousing & Shelter$36kEducation$27kArts & Culture$17kInternational$16kHuman Services$16kCrime & Legal$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$513k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE$5,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE KING COUNTY$5,000
THE NEXT DOOR$4,000
SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY$3,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$3,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,000
HOOD RIVER AREA TRAILS STEWARDS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 33% of Keller Kingsberg Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 26% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 16% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Keller Kingsberg Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$202k · 20 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$202k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthEnvironmentAnimalsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +12%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +630%
  • TN
    THE NEXT DOOR INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • MS
    MAIN STREET MOSIER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -55%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
  • AF
    ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center and the most unlike its peers is Hood River Area Trail Stewards. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Affordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENPEACE FUND — $37,000 · OtherGREENPEACE FUNDHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $25,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTYBoston College Innocence Program — $11,000 · OtherBoston College Innocence ProgramFriends of the Columbia Gorge — $9,000 · OtherFriends of the Columbia GorgePAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $6,000 · OtherTHE SMART PROGRAM — $5,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $7,000 · OtherMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $5,000 · Other+9 more — $23,000 · Other+9 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $38,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD …ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $4,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDAT…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,500 · HealthPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $10,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $3,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $2,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationBowdoin College — $2,000 · EducationPOLARIS PROJECT — $8,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,000 · InternationalALIGHT — $4,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 · InternationalTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $13,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $4,200 · Crime & LegalMAIN STREET MOSIER — $10,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $1,000 · EnvironmentDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE DOE FUND INC — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$133,500Health$43,500Education$19,000International$18,000Crime & Legal$17,200Environment$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $38,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $25,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Columbia Gorge — $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOOD RIVER AREA TRAIL STEWARDS — $4,000 over 4y, 37% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARESTART — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROWENA WILDLIFE CLINIC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greenfish FoundationOR15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greenfish Foundation · The Stebbins Fund Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Keller Kingsberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • The Next Door Inc39% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Keller Kingsberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Keller Kingsberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph