Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kearns Saldinger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$67kHealth$63kFood & Nutrition$51kHuman Services$49kAnimals$27kPhilanthropy$13kReligion$12kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$336k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
San Diego Food Bank$10,500
Stanford University$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Father Joe's Village$7,474
San Diego Zoo$5,000
Children's National Research Instit$5,000
The Old Globe$5,000
Love on Your Back$2,000
Salvation Army$1,066
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kids at Risk Action: $10k → 11%Wellspring Womens Center: $5k → 12%Kids at Risk Action: $5k → 11%Wellspring Womens Center: $5k → 12%Mirys List: $5k → 14%Love on Your Back: $2k → 11%Wellspring Womens Center: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Kearns Saldinger Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 64%.

Kearns Saldinger Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$236k · 18 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$236k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+24%

Still filing today

39%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KIDS AT RISK ACTION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +17%
  • K
    KARA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $14k · revenue +52%
  • WW
    WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • BS
    Beverly Shores Elementary School
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
6
Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara County

The mission of family service agency is to strengthen and advocate for families and individuals of all ages and diversities, helping to create and preserve a healthy community.

Human Services
7
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

—
8
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
11
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc

To enhance the health, wellness, and resilience of every community we serve - see schedule o for more details

—
12
Ywca Metropolitan Chicago

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Kids At Risk Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Stanford Health Care Partners Fund: $45,000 · OtherStanford Health Care Partners FundIndividual grant recipient: $25,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSan Diego Zoo: $20,000 · OtherSan Diego ZooAssociated Students of Stanford Uni: $20,000 · OtherAssociated Students of Stanford UniCitrus County Schools: $17,414 · OtherCitrus County SchoolsKARA: $13,500 · OtherKARASHARE OUR STRENGTH: $13,250 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHBeverly Shores Elementary School: $12,455 · OtherBeverly Shores Elementary SchoolSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · Other+19 more: $54,576 · Other+19 moreKIDS AT RISK ACTION: $15,200 · Human ServicesKIDS AT RIS…WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $12,112 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING …MIRY'S LIST: $5,000 · Human ServicesMIRY'S LISTLOVE ON YOUR BACK: $2,000 · Human ServicesLOVE ON YOU…SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $13,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $11,000 · HealthTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSumter Schools Enhancement Foundation Inc: $1,000 · EducationHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS FOR YOUTH INC: $9,000 · Youth Development
Other$231,395Human Services$34,312Food & Nutrition$23,500Health$11,000Education$11,000Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS AT RISK ACTION: $15,200 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetKARA: $13,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $13,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $12,112 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR YOUTH INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE ON YOUR BACK: $2,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSumter Schools Enhancement Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGirl Scouts of West Central Florida Inc: $833 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $710 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS AT RISK ACTION ↗
  • Who funds KARA ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MIRY'S LIST ↗
  • Who funds LOVE ON YOUR BACK ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Sumter Schools Enhancement Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of West Central Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kearns Saldinger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kearns Saldinger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kearns Saldinger’s filings →

More from the funding graph