Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kasperick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$8.7MFood & Nutrition$2.7MHousing & Shelter$2.2MHuman Services$1.6MEnvironment$1.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.2MEducation$1.2MCommunity Improvement$1.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k17 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.3M
$150,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$126M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHOLE PLANET FOUNDATION$500,000
TRICKLE UP PROGRAM$300,000
VILLAGE ENTERPRISES$300,000
FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE$300,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
WORKING CAPITAL FOR COMMUNITY NEEDS$250,000
CENTRO DE SERVICIOS FINANCIEROS AKA FUNDER COL MIRAMONTES$200,000
INKOMOKO$200,000
NEW HORIZON ASSOCIATION$199,890
GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS$186,525
SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISION$150,000
EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($17M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($3.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO: $150k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 11%GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS: $187k → 17%ANGEL'S FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $25k → 11%ANGEL'S FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $25k → 11%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $130k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 11%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $100k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
TX

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($3.3M)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
France$1.0M · 4 grants
Haiti$581k · 2 grants
Mozambique$500k · 4 grants
Egypt$500k · 4 grants
Honduras$400k · 2 grants
Senegal$300k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 78% of Kasperick Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 6%.

Kasperick Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 51% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 35 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
18

Total granted

$17M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+46%

Still filing today

71%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Whole Foods Market Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +261%
  • TU
    TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $980k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • FK
    FONDASYON KOLE ZEPOL AKA FONKOZE
    one grant, 2024 · $381k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • CD
    CENTRO DE SERVICIOS FINANCIEROS AKA FUNDER
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Family Service of San Diego

Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.

Human Services
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
5
Destination Home Sv co Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Destination: home's mission is to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in santa clara county.

Housing & Shelter
6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
9
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
10
Urban Street Angels Inc

Founded in 2012, urban street angels is a san diego native 501(c)3 attentive to supporting homeless youth through supportive housing, peer support, mentorship, mental health counseling, and job training initiatives, in order to develop a…

Religion
11
San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program Inc

The mission of san diego volunteer lawyer program, inc. is to provide equal access to the justice system by serving as a bridge between indigent and other disadvantaged people in san diego county and the volunteer lawyers who are willing…

Social Science
12
San Diego Housing Federation

The Federation brings together representatives of affordable housing community development corporations with others interested in the development and management of housing for low and moderate income persons in San Diego County to mutually…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Whole Foods Market Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
28/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1,180,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $1,025,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $980,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOVILLAGE ENTERPRISES: $808,087 · OtherVILLAGE ENTERPRISESMYAGRO FARMS: $800,000 · OtherMYAGRO FARMSAFRICAWORKS PARA COMUNIDADES RURAIS: $500,000 · OtherNEW HORIZON ASSOCIATION: $499,890 · OtherFONDASYON KOLE ZEPOL AKA FONKOZE: $381,260 · Other+31 more: $3,449,775 · Other+31 moreTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $1,527,812 · InternationalTHE BOMA PROJECT INCTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE: $600,000 · InternationalTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGEVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $591,137 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUNDWORKING CAPITAL FOR COMMUNITY NEEDS INC: $580,000 · InternationalWORKING CAPITAL FOR COMM…ONE ACRE FUND: $400,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDBRAC USA INC: $380,000 · InternationalBRAC USA INCINKOMOKO: $200,000 · International+1 more: $100,000 · InternationalWhole Foods Market Foundation: $1,330,000 · Community ImprovementWhole Foods Ma…TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $1,200,000 · Community ImprovementTRICKLE UP PRO…ACCESSITY: $100,000 · Community ImprovementSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $630,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC: $186,525 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $150,000 · Human ServicesPATH: $100,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $50,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50,000 · Human Services+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $830,000 · Housing & ShelterEAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterSAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION: $300,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $300,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $300,000 · Food & NutritionST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $455,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $100,000 · Religion
Other$9,624,012International$4,378,949Community Improvement$2,630,000Human Services$1,191,525Housing & Shelter$1,080,000Food & Nutrition$900,000Religion$555,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $1,527,812 over 4y, 17% of budgetWhole Foods Market Foundation: $1,330,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $1,200,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $980,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $830,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetMYAGRO FARMS: $800,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $630,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE: $600,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $591,137 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWORKING CAPITAL FOR COMMUNITY NEEDS INC: $580,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $455,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $400,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRAC USA INC: $380,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION: $300,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $230,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $225,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTARIQ KHAMISA FOUNDATION INC TKF: $125,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetPATH: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCESSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetGlobal Impact: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN BEACH ELEMENTARY PTA: $2,500 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Whole Foods Market Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MYAGRO FARMS ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORKING CAPITAL FOR COMMUNITY NEEDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds INKOMOKO ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TARIQ KHAMISA FOUNDATION INC TKF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA27.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kasperick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kasperick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kasperick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph