How much did Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return grant in FY2025?

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return reported 10 itemized grants totaling $1,700,050, out of $2,038,990 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return based?

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return is based in IN.

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return

To administer local chapters of the kappa alpha theta fraternity.

$2.0M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$1.5M

Largest

01What you fund

0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.

Education$3.1MCivil Rights$634kCrime & Legal$220kHuman Services$136kHealth$96kYouth Development$17kCommunity Improvement$12kOther$110k

02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $1,700,050 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,038,990 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $338,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $14k
$10k–50k6 grants · $118k
$50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$250k+1 grant · $1.5M

$17,902

Median grant

States reached

$19M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION	$1,488,415
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY	$78,877
ONE LOVE FOUNDATION	$33,393
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION	$31,137
AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK	$17,902
MONROE COUNTY CASA	$14,146
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC	$11,749
HEART OF MISSOURI CASA	$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA	$9,050
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY	$5,381

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.9M · 17 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.9M

$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%

+7%

Still filing today

100%

90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KA
KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION INC
3× · 2023–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +50%
VF
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $72k · revenue +78%
MC
MONROE COUNTY CASA INC
3× · 2023–2025 · $66k · revenue +3%

Funded once

CA
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY
one grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue -10%
CC
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASA INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $29k · revenue +27%
VF
VOICES FOR CHILDREN
one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Court Appointed Special Advocates Casa of Liberty/Chambers Counties

None

Human Services

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Bastrop Count

The organization recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who provide advocacy services to child victims removed by the state from homes because of abuse or neglect

Civil Rights

Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights

Central Georgia Casa Inc

Central georgia casa provides high quality volunteer advocacy to child victims of abuse and neglect who have been adjudicated dependent by the juvenile court and placed in foster care. providing this high-quality volunteer advocacy…

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates in the Heart of Texas

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights

Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Denton County Inc

To provide trained community volunteers, to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, and to promote community awareness about child abuse issues.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt

To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the South Plains Inc and the most unlike its peers is Autistic Self Advocacy Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/47

the rest of the field

10%

4,324/41,948

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

46/47

Grantees still filing

23/47

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$3,067,012Civil Rights$633,667Crime & Legal$220,074Human Services$135,810Other$109,532Health$95,775Youth Development$16,694Community Improvement$11,672

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation IncIN62.2× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Inc · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Dutch Bros Foundation · Ticket to Dream Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Texas Casa Inc · The Allstate Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return?

Find your warmest path to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines