How much does Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return give?

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return reported 10 itemized grants totaling $1,700,050, out of $2,038,990 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 21 and 39 organizations a year over FY2023 to FY2024.

What does Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return fund?

By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (71%), Crime & Legal (22%), Human Services (2%).

Who are Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2023 to FY2025: Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Inc ($3.0M), Casa of Tarrant County Inc ($234k), National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($86k).

Does Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Inc, National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association, Dutch Bros Foundation.

Where is Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return based?

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return is based in IN.

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return at a glance

· Public charity

Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return

To administer local chapters of the kappa alpha theta fraternity.

$2.0M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$1.5M

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$3.1MCrime & Legal$934kHuman Services$99kHealth$96kCivil Rights$56kYouth Development$17kCommunity Improvement$12kOther$0

02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 10 grants below total $1,700,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,038,990 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $338,940 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $14k
$10k–50k6 grants · $118k
$50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$250k+1 grant · $1.5M

$17,902

Median grant

States reached

$19M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION	$1,488,415
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY	$78,877
ONE LOVE FOUNDATION	$33,393
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION	$31,137
AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK	$17,902
MONROE COUNTY CASA	$14,146
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC	$11,749
HEART OF MISSOURI CASA	$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA	$9,050
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY	$5,381

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$3.9M · 17 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.9M

$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%

+7%

Still filing today

100%

90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KA
KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION INC
3× · 2023–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +50%
VF
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $72k · revenue +78%
MC
MONROE COUNTY CASA INC
3× · 2023–2025 · $66k · revenue +3%

Funded once

CA
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY
one grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue -10%
CC
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASA INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $29k · revenue +27%
VF
VOICES FOR CHILDREN
one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue -8%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Court Appointed Special Advocates Casa of Liberty/Chambers Counties

None

Human Services

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Bastrop Count

The organization recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who provide advocacy services to child victims removed by the state from homes because of abuse or neglect

Civil Rights

Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights

Central Georgia Casa Inc

Central georgia casa provides high quality volunteer advocacy to child victims of abuse and neglect who have been adjudicated dependent by the juvenile court and placed in foster care. providing this high-quality volunteer advocacy…

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates in the Heart of Texas

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights

Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Denton County Inc

To provide trained community volunteers, to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, and to promote community awareness about child abuse issues.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt

To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the South Plains Inc; the most unlike its peers is Autistic Self Advocacy Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

46/47

Grantees still filing

22/47

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Education$3,067,012Civil Rights$633,667Crime & Legal$220,074Human Services$135,810Other$109,532Health$95,775Youth Development$16,694Community Improvement$11,672

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation IncIN62.2× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Inc · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Dutch Bros Foundation · Ticket to Dream Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Texas Casa Inc · The Allstate Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return?

Find your warmest path to Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Return’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home