Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kamran Farid Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$162kHealth$70kHuman Services$65kEducation$59kCommunity Improvement$52kYouth Development$33kInternational$30kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,400
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCSU Foundation$10,000
Project Corazon$10,000
One Heart for Women & Children$10,000
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society$10,000
Variety Boys & Girls Club of Queens$7,500
Girl Inc of Meriden$5,400
Make-A-Wish$5,000
Orlando Sports Foundation$5,000
Ethaar$5,000
Project Downtown Orlando$3,000
Agape Community Center$1,076
Individual grant recipient$1,030
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Single Mother's Outreach: $5k → 11%Helping Mamas Inc: $5k → 9%Ethaar: $5k → 14%WeFam United: $5k → 13%IDEAS FOR US: $5k → 13%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $25k → 13%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $15k → 13%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $15k → 13%One Heart for Women & Children: $10k → 13%One Heart for Women & Children: $5k → 13%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $5k → 13%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CO
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 11 repeat orgs$346k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
39

Total granted

$307k
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+28%

Still filing today

82%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    One Heart For Women and Children Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +336%
  • MW
    MUSLIM WOMEN'S ORGANIZATION CORP
    3× · 2018–2021 · $39k · revenue +135%
  • FB
    FEED BRANFORD KIDS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $65k
  • WH
    West Haven Board of Education
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • P
    PAANI
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
2
Hope Helps Inc

To prevent and reduce hunger and homelessness in central florida by equipping individuals and families to become self-sufficient through housing, outreach, prevention, and education.

Human Services
3
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
4
Deliver the Difference Inc

Deliver The Difference is a humanitarian hunger relief organizations. We believe it is wrong that children go to bed hungry and not knowing where their next meal will come from. We believe it is wrong that seniors have to decided whether…

—
5
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
6
Feed the Children Inc

We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s. and around the world. together with communities, we provide food, essentials, and opportunities so every child can survive and thrive.

International
7
City Relief Inc

City relief provides fresh, nutritious meals and essential care items to individuals in need; as well as creating individualized action plans including connections to programs,offering support and encouragement.

Human Services
8
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
9
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
10
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
11
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
12
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Women's Organization Corp; the most unlike its peers is Central Florida Allstars Booster Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $64,653 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCSU Foundation: $35,000 · OtherSCSU FoundationHarbor House of Central Florida Inc: $28,062 · OtherHarbor House of Central Florida IncCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC: $22,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INCWest Haven Board of Education: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+34 more: $163,256 · Other+34 moreOne Heart For Women and Children Inc: $79,999 · Human ServicesOne Heart For Women…Eid Orlando Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesEid Orlando IncWefam United Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesHELPING MAMAS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesEsther Single Mothers Outreach Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesETHAAR INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesIDEAS FOR US INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…CURE RARE DISEASE INC: $10,000 · HealthCURE RARE …THE TOMMY FUND INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE TOMMY …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…MUSLIM WOMEN'S ORGANIZATION CORP: $38,500 · Community ImprovementFEED BRANFORD KIDS INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionPAANI: $15,000 · EnvironmentHAVENS HARVEST INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentPEACE AND JUSTICE INSTITUTE INC: $10,109 · Crime & Legal
Other$373,471Human Services$114,999Health$60,000Community Improvement$38,500Food & Nutrition$35,000Environment$20,000Crime & Legal$10,109

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne Heart For Women and Children Inc: $79,999 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetMUSLIM WOMEN'S ORGANIZATION CORP: $38,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetFEED BRANFORD KIDS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHarbor House of Central Florida Inc: $28,062 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC: $22,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPAANI: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF MERIDEN: $10,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TOMMY FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetREBUILD GLOBALLY: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEid Orlando Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF QUEENS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWefam United Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetHELPING MAMAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVENS HARVEST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEsther Single Mothers Outreach Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF HAMDEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED GLOBAL OUTREACH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOrlando Sports Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIDEAS FOR US INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAgape Community Center: $1,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Florida FoundationFL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Gap Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kamran Farid Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kamran Farid Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Ideas for Us Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Harbor House of Central Florida Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Meriden: 21% of income from government
  • The Children's Center of Hamden Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Sea Research Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Orlando Sports Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Peace and Justice Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wefam United Inc: 0% of income from government
  • United Global Outreach Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kamran Farid’s filings →

More from the funding graph