· Private foundation
Kamran Farid Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCSU Foundation | $10,000 |
| Project Corazon | $10,000 |
| Leukemia & Lymphoma Society | $10,000 |
| One Heart for Women & Children | $10,000 |
| Variety Boys & Girls Club of Queens | $7,500 |
| Girl Inc of Meriden | $5,400 |
| Orlando Sports Foundation | $5,000 |
| Make-A-Wish | $5,000 |
| Ethaar | $5,000 |
| Project Downtown Orlando | $3,000 |
| Agape Community Center | $1,076 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,030 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OHOne Heart For Women and Children Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +336%
- MWMUSLIM WOMEN'S ORGANIZATION CORP3× · 2018–2021 · $39k · revenue +135%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $65k
- WHWest Haven Board of Educationone grant, 2019 · $15k
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.
To prevent and reduce hunger and homelessness in central florida by equipping individuals and families to become self-sufficient through housing, outreach, prevention, and education.
Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…
Deliver The Difference is a humanitarian hunger relief organizations. We believe it is wrong that children go to bed hungry and not knowing where their next meal will come from. We believe it is wrong that seniors have to decided whether…
The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.
We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s. and around the world. together with communities, we provide food, essentials, and opportunities so every child can survive and thrive.
City relief provides fresh, nutritious meals and essential care items to individuals in need; as well as creating individualized action plans including connections to programs,offering support and encouragement.
The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…
Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Women's Organization Corp and the most unlike its peers is Central Florida Allstars Booster Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 16% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds One Heart For Women and Children Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM WOMEN'S ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds FEED BRANFORD KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Harbor House of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DINING ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds PAANI ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF MERIDEN ↗
- Who funds PEACE AND JUSTICE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CURE RARE DISEASE INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILD GLOBALLY ↗
- Who funds THE TOMMY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Eid Orlando Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF QUEENS INC ↗
- Who funds SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF HAMDEN INC ↗
- Who funds HAVENS HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds Esther Single Mothers Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED GLOBAL OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds Wefam United Inc ↗
- Who funds Orlando Sports Foundation ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Gap Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kamran Farid Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ideas for Us Inc — 35% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Meriden — 21% of income from government
- The Children's Center of Hamden Inc — 20% of income from government
- Sea Research Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Orlando Sports Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Peace and Justice Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wefam United Inc — 0% of income from government
- United Global Outreach Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.