Skip to content
Kache Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kache Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$148kInternational$33kHuman Services$13kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$6kCivil Rights$5kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
23
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY$3,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OK$2,000
MERCY SHIPS$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$2,000
FOUNDATION FOR PM&R$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
UNHCR$2,000
JOHN 316 MISSION$1,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,500
SEVA FOUNDATION$1,400
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$1,200
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,200
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $300 → 20%JOHN 316 MISSION: $2k → 14%TULSA BOYS HOME: $500 → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $500 → 26%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $200 → 20%JOHN 316 MISSION: $2k → 14%TULSA BOYS HOME: $500 → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $1k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
AR
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$213k · 49 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 47 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
13

Total granted

$213k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+0%

Still filing today

69%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEVA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +10%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    one grant, 2024 · $700
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $600 · revenue 0%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
6
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
7
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
10
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
12
Water for People

Water for people exists to develop high quality water and sanitation, accessible to all, and sustained by strong communities, businesses, and governments, working in ten countries; guatemala, honduras, tanzania, peru, bolivia, uganda,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
18/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $120,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNSF: $18,000 · OtherNSF+37 more: $39,600 · Other+37 moreSEVA FOUNDATION: $8,400 · InternationalSEVA FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMAN…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…Mercy Corps: $4,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,200 · InternationalUnited States Ass…Mercy Ships International: $2,000 · InternationalMercy Ships Inter…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,600 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,300 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,300 · International+12 more: $6,700 · International+12 moreJOHN 316 MISSION: $3,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $700 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $600 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,250 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $500 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$177,880International$35,500Human Services$9,500Crime & Legal$3,250Health$2,500Education$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $8,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelen Keller Foundation Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Mission: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hardesty Family F…Oneok Foundation IncGeorge Kaiser Family …Tulsa Community Found…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Hardesty Family Foundation IncOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Oneok Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kache Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kache Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kache’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home