Skip to content

· Private foundation

Justice for Animals Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$314k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$499kAnimals$421kEducation$18kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$1k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $242k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vegan Outreach$142,000
Good Food Institute$100,000
The Humane League$40,000
Mercy for Animals$10,000
Tapestry$8,000
Physicians Com for Responsible Med$5,000
Lever Foundation$5,000
Mary T and Frank L Hoffman Found$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Compassion in World Farming USA: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$888k · 9 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$888k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+65%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $405k · revenue +49%
  • MF
    MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +86%
  • EC
    EDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $57k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • FL
    Frank L and Mary T Hoffman Found
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue +65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
3
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
4
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
5
Institute for Animal Happiness

Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…

Animals
6
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
7
Farm Sanctuary Inc

We pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living through education and policy advocacy.

Animals
8
Global Food Partners Inc

Global food partners ("gfp") is an animal protection organization whose mission is to help food businesses meet their cage-free egg commitments and producers implement cage-free best practices.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Animal Concerns Trust (Fact Inc)

Food animal concerns trust (fact) promotes the safe and humane production of meat, milk, and eggs. fact envisions that all food-producing animals be raised in a healthy and humane manner so that everyone will have access to safe and…

Animals
10
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
11
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
12
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creaturekind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $405,000 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INCVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $228,000 · Food & NutritionVEGAN OUTREACH INCMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $75,000 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMAL…THE HUMANE LEAGUE: $55,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGU…LEVER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTapestry: $26,000 · OtherTapestryMary T and Frank L Hoffman Found: $24,000 · OtherMary T and …Creature Kind: $15,000 · OtherCreature Ki…Frank L and Mary T Hoffman Found: $10,000 · OtherFrank L and…Individual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual …Physicians Com for Responsible Med: $5,000 · OtherCREATUREKIND: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $5,000 · OtherEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $57,000 · EducationPLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC: $5,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION: $9,000 · Crime & LegalCompassion in World Farming Inc: $1,000 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$633,000Animals$135,000Other$98,000Education$67,000Crime & Legal$9,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $405,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $228,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $57,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCREATUREKIND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion in World Farming Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAUNALYTICS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds VEGAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANTPURE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATUREKIND ↗
  • Who funds LEVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Compassion in World Farming Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAUNALYTICS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humane America Animal FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humane America Animal Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Animal Charity Evaluators · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Justice for Animals Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Justice for Animals Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Justice for Animals Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Justice for Animals Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Justice for Animals’ filings →

    More from the funding graph