Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

CREATUREKIND

CREATUREKIND (Oregon) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $880,277 to it, the largest being BETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC ($618,337). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$880k
Net assets
$6k
1/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 94%
01What it does

What Creaturekind does

Mission

Christian-based animal advocacy

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Fellowship to support seminary student interested in promoting Christian-based animal advocacy

    $0 spentof which $16,050 as grants
    0% of program spending
  2. Default Veg Program to promote vegetable-based food options in churches and seminaries

    $7,500 spent
    68% of program spending
  3. Website development to enhance materials available to promote Christian-based animal advocacy

    $3,500 spent
    32% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $11,000.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($263k) Expenses 100 ($117k) Net assets 100 ($147k)2021 Revenue 90 ($237k) Expenses 225 ($263k) Net assets 85 ($124k)2022 Revenue 107 ($281k) Expenses 298 ($348k) Net assets 39 ($58k)2023 Revenue 91 ($240k) Expenses 224 ($261k) Net assets 25 ($37k)2024 Revenue 47 ($125k) Expenses 99 ($115k) Net assets 31 ($46k)2025 Revenue 2 ($4k) Expenses 30 ($35k) Net assets 4 ($6k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (2)Expenses (30)Net assets (4)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $139k to $76k (−45%).

$157k
$139k
$76k
$43k
$46k
$6k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$147k
’20
−$26k
’21
−$67k
’22
−$21k
’23
$9k
’24
−$30k
’25
1.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2020202120222023
Listed12121214
Joined·+0+0+3
No longer listed·001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $248k → $95k.

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CREATUREKIND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CREATUREKIND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CREATUREKIND.

70%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 60% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

CREATUREKIND draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 4 states in all.

IL
OR
OH
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $155k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CREATUREKIND

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

88%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CREATUREKIND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CREATUREKIND?
CREATUREKIND (Oregon) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $880,277 to it, the largest being BETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC ($618,337). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CREATUREKIND have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $880,277 in grants to CREATUREKIND, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CREATUREKIND?
BETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $618,337 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CREATUREKIND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing