Skip to content
Justfundus at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Justfundus

Justfund makes moving money to nonprofits simple and easy.

$7.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
171
Grants FY2025still arriving
32
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.2MCivil Rights$466kPublic Benefit$283kCrime & Legal$42kCommunity Improvement$21kEnvironment$12kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2025 · 171 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k119 grants · $2.6M
  • $50k–250k51 grants · $4.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$32,890
Median grant
32
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES FOUNDATION$275,000
AMALGAMATED FOUNDATION$218,900
CIVIC TN$200,000
INQUILIXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA$175,000
UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY$150,000
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC$150,000
PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA$150,000
ALABAMA FORWARD$150,000
VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS-VOCAL-NY-INC$150,000
RESIST INC$148,660
NORTH CAROLINA TENANTS UNION$125,000
NEO PHILANTHROPY INC$110,000
MISSISSIPPI ENGAGED$100,000
RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE INC$100,000
SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INSTITUTO LAB: $38k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $74k → 17%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $50k → 11%MOVING MOUNTAINS INCORPORATED: $50k → 11%MEKONG INC: $50k → 28%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $33k → 12%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $30k → 18%BARRED BUSINESS FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%MIGRANT EQUITY SOUTHEAST INC: $10k → 16%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $150k → 10%POWER SAFE PLACE RESOURCE CENTER OF VIRGINIA: $50k → 10%AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC: $35k → 22%ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP: $10k → 11%CANOPY YOUNG ADULT COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $50k → 21%KOREAN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10k → 10%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE (HBA): $35k → 11%UNIQUE WOMAN'S COALITION: $25k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE EQUALITY ADVOCACY PROJECT: $50k → 28%SOMALI BANTU COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 13%POSSIBILITY LABS: $52k → 10%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $12k → 14%KHMER MAINE: $15k → 7%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC: $25k → 17%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLES AGENDA: $30k → 13%PRESENTE MAINE: $30k → 7%MAINE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE SERVICES (MEIRS): $15k → 13%GATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES MAINE: $15k → 7%MAINE IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS COALITION: $15k → 7%MAINE ACCESS IMMIGRANT NETWORK: $15k → 7%FOOD FOR ALL SERVICES: $15k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
TN
DC
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 3 repeat orgs$6.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8443% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 161 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
19

Total granted

$1.2M
$525k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8443%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Amalgamated Foundation
    2× · 2021–2022 · $840k
  • MP
    MI PODER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $275k · revenue ×85
  • LV
    LUPE VOTES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MV
    MISSISSIPPI VOTES ACTION FUND CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -36%
  • TV
    TIRRC VOTESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +42%
  • TE
    THE EQUITY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
4
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
5
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
6
Asian Pacific Environmental Network

APEN builds immigrant and refugee power for a just transition with local roots and statewide impact so all people can live, work, learn, play and thrive in a clean and healthy environment.

Environment
7
Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center

The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.

Human Services
8
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
9
Black Alliance for Just Immigration

The organization provides public education on the issues related to fair and just immigration policies.

Arts & Culture
10
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
11
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
12
Equality Alliance of San Diego

Alliance is a community organization working to build a more inclusive democracy so that all people can achieve their full potential in an environment of harmony, safety, equality, and justice. Alliance develops leaders, builds coalitions,…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

178 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 178 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
177/178
Grantees still filing
84/178
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Amalgamated Foundation: $840,007 · OtherAmalgamated FoundationRESIST INC: $148,660 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA TENANTS UNION: $125,000 · OtherLUPE VOTES: $120,000 · OtherVOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC: $150,000 · OtherINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE: $175,000 · Other+64 more: $1,849,060 · Other+64 moreMI PODER: $275,000 · Civil RightsMI PODERCIVIC TN: $200,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC TNFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC: $150,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER…ALABAMA FORWARD: $150,000 · Civil RightsALABAMA FORWARDPROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA: $150,000 · Civil RightsPROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP …RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $100,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIA…MISSISSIPPI VOTES ACTION FUND CORPORATION: $100,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI VOTES ACTIO…MISSISSIPPI ENGAGED: $100,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI ENGAGEDTIRRC VOTES: $100,000 · Civil RightsTIRRC VOTESTHE EQUITY ALLIANCE: $100,000 · Civil RightsTHE EQUITY ALLIANCE+17 more: $415,500 · Civil Rights+17 moreUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $150,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FOR A NE…PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $73,660 · Human ServicesPIONEER VALLEY …POSSIBILITY LABS: $52,105 · Human ServicesPower Safe Place Resource Center of Virginia: $50,000 · Human ServicesMekong Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesMOVING MOUNTAINS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER MISSOURI: $50,000 · Human ServicesCanopy Young Adult Community House Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesLighthouse Equality Advocacy Project Incorporated: $50,000 · Human ServicesTodec Legal Center Perris: $50,000 · Human Services+30 more: $584,395 · Human Services+30 moreAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $529,422 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated C…TIDES FOUNDATION: $275,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDAT…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER P…HOPEWELL FUND: $50,000 · PhilanthropyGame Changing Men Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN OF THE SETTING SUN PRODUCT: $35,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $25,638 · PhilanthropyTexas Latino Pride: $50,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF JUDSON INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureROOT CAUSE RESEARCH CENTER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWISHTOYO FOUNDATION DBA WISHTOYO CHUMASH FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureBROOKLINE IL PERETZ SCHOOL OF THE WORKMENS CIRCLE INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation: $32,895 · Arts & CultureGWICHIN STEERING COMMITTEE: $32,895 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS VALUES INITIATIVE INC: $32,895 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $27,174 · Arts & CultureIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $60,000 · Arts & CultureSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EnvironmentOCEANIC ASCENT EDUCATION & ATHLETICS INC: $65,790 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUND: $50,000 · EnvironmentGREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentSAGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentUNKITAWA: $35,000 · EnvironmentLOWER PHALEN CREEK PROJECT: $32,895 · EnvironmentRED CLOUD RENEWABLE: $32,895 · EnvironmentHUI KAHUWAI: $32,895 · EnvironmentWHITESWAN ENVIRONMENTAL WE: $32,895 · Environment+2 more: $22,000 · EnvironmentBlack Freedom Fund: $100,000 · Community ImprovementSouthside Together Organizing For Power: $50,000 · Community ImprovementLA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO: $50,000 · Community ImprovementFINANCIAL SERVICES STAKEHOLDER PROJECT NFP: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $32,895 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEMENT: $30,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH-MISSOULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSowega Rising: $21,000 · Community ImprovementAlianza Agricola Inc: $20,000 · Community Improvement+8 more: $95,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,407,727Civil Rights$1,840,500Human Services$1,210,160Philanthropy$1,045,060Arts & Culture$515,859Environment$474,370Community Improvement$473,895

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $529,422 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMI PODER: $275,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE: $175,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLUPE VOTES: $120,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VOTES ACTION FUND CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTIRRC VOTES: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE EQUITY ALLIANCE: $100,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center: $90,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $73,660 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouthside Together Organizing For Power: $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMOMENTUM COMMUNITY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPower Safe Place Resource Center of Virginia: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMOVING MOUNTAINS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetEMPOWER MISSOURI: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGame Changing Men Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLighthouse Equality Advocacy Project Incorporated: $50,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetROOT CAUSE RESEARCH CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $47,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK INC: $35,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPurposed Focused Alternative Learning Corporation: $35,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBERING SEA ELDERS GROUP: $35,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetBROOKLINE IL PERETZ SCHOOL OF THE WORKMENS CIRCLE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSAGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOWER PHALEN CREEK PROJECT: $32,895 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGWICHIN STEERING COMMITTEE: $32,895 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $32,895 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGeorgia Coalition for the People's Agenda: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFJC: $26,455 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAfrican-American Community Trust NFP: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCAROLINA FEDERATION FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMassachusetts Budget and Policy Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEquity for All Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetTHE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $24,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSowega Rising: $21,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN REVIVAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPEOPLE'S PARITY PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAlianza Agricola Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncTides FoundationGeorgia Alliance Educ…Amalgamated Charitabl…Windward FundThe Community Foundat…New Venture FundProgeorgia State Tabl…All Hands on Deck Net…United Way of Greater…Borealis PhilanthropyCommon Counsel Founda…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · New Venture Fund · Progeorgia State Table Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Justfundus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Justfundus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Justfundus?

    Find your warmest path to Justfundus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 190 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Justfundus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home