How much did JUSTFUNDUS grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of JUSTFUNDUS’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $27k
$10k–50k14 grants · $218k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k

$12,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

MI PODER$100,000
GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLES AGENDA$30,000
EQUITY FOR ALL INC$25,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS-EF$24,000
SOWEGA RISING$21,000
LUPE VOTES$20,000
WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA$12,000
BARRED BUSINESS FOUNDATION$12,000
GEORGIA CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$12,000
WOMEN ENGAGED INC$12,000
URBAN JUSTICE CENTER$10,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROJECT$10,000
ACT 4 SA$10,000
SOUTHERN WOMEN IN MOTION FOUNDATION INC$10,000
KILOMETRO 0 INC$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 3 repeat orgs$836k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+807%

+940%

Still filing today

67%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
Amalgamated Foundation
2× · 2021–2022 · $840k
MP
MI Poder
2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +324%
LV
LUPE Votes
2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +807%

Funded once

AF
Amalgamated Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $311k · revenue +156814%
TI
Tennessee Immigrant & Refugeegraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +345%
MV
Mississippi Votes Action Fundgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +940%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Transforming Georgia Inc

Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.

Civil Rights

Civica Initiatives

Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions

Community Improvement

Equal Vote Coalition

The Equal Vote Coalitions mission is to promote true equality in the vote We conduct and support top-notch research educate communities and build coalitions Our five core principles for electoral reform mandate that proposals we support…

Civil Rights

Black Voters Matter Fund Inc

Our goal is to increase power in our communities through effective voting. We increase voter registration and help develop voting infrastructure and to pursue policies that expands access to the ballot.

—

North Carolina Black Alliance Inc

The North Carolina Black Alliance (NCBA) works toward state-level systemic change by strengthening the network of elected officials representing communities of color throughout the state and collaborating with progressive, grassroots…

Education

The Justice Workshop

(1) Community Outreach to educate on the interconnectivity of systems, and impact structural and systemic change in the areas of criminal, electoral, and economic justice in the United States; and (2) Policy Reform and Direct Lobbying…

Civil Rights

Minnesota Voice

Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.

Public Benefit

Georgia for All Inc

Providing education of the public on local and national issues, in order to combat misinformation, through targeted digital marketing, based on data, and community engagement.

—

League of Women Voters of

Civil Rights

More Than a Vote

Educate, energize, and protect voters as they headed to the ballot box. but, as our name makes clear, we were always about more than voting.

Civil Rights

South Georgia Voters League Inc

Increase voter education and partcipation

Education

League of Minority Voters

Promote the advancement of minority civic rights through education and empowerment and bringing a voice to the issues that uniquely impact communities of color.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Shift Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southern Women in Motion Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

19/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,000,007Civil Rights$560,500Philanthropy$310,522Human Services$54,000Community Improvement$31,000Crime & Legal$20,000Environment$12,000Education$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncNY23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc · Windward Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Progeorgia State Table Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Georgia Budget and Policy Institute Inc · All Voting Is Local · Tides Advocacy

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JUSTFUNDUS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LUPE Votes.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 9.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852786747 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LUPE Votes, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Justfundus?

Find your warmest path to Justfundus through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JUSTFUNDUS

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Justfundus?

More from the funding graph

JUSTFUNDUS

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Justfundus?

More from the funding graph