· Public charity
Justfundus
Justfund makes moving money to nonprofits simple and easy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $345,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,132,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $787,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $218k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MI PODER | $100,000 |
| GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLES AGENDA | $30,000 |
| EQUITY FOR ALL INC | $25,000 |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS-EF | $24,000 |
| SOWEGA RISING | $21,000 |
| LUPE VOTES | $20,000 |
| WOMEN ENGAGED INC | $12,000 |
| GEORGIA CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND | $12,000 |
| WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA | $12,000 |
| BARRED BUSINESS FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| SOUTHERN WOMEN IN MOTION FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| KILOMETRO 0 INC | $10,000 |
| ACT 4 SA | $10,000 |
| URBAN JUSTICE CENTER | $10,000 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROJECT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8443% since the first grant, against -33% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAmalgamated Foundation2× · 2021–2022 · $840k
- MPMI PODER2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue ×85
- LVLUPE VOTES2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- TVTIRRC VOTESgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +42%
- MVMISSISSIPPI VOTES ACTION FUND CORPORATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -36%
- TETHE EQUITY ALLIANCEone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.
The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia. This support includes advocacy work, program development, technical assistance, grant making, and more. Our…
Our goal is to increase power in our communities through effective voting. We increase voter registration and help develop voting infrastructure and to pursue policies that expands access to the ballot.
To support progressive civic engagement
Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions
(1) Community Outreach to educate on the interconnectivity of systems, and impact structural and systemic change in the areas of criminal, electoral, and economic justice in the United States; and (2) Policy Reform and Direct Lobbying…
Women's March is committed to dismantling systems of oppression through nonviolent resistance and building inclusive structures guided by self-determination, dignity and respect.
Galeo impact fund strives for a better georgia where the latino community is respected and recognized, elected officials are held accountable, and georgians are engaged civically.
The mission of the collective renaissance guild is to educate, inform and train young leaders to build community and serve black communities and communities across the globe. we do this by elevating blac
Our organization combats gun violence works to turn out the vote pushes for laws to help previously incarcerated and issues related to social injustice.
Voter education around policy
The aaaf amplifies the collective power of georgia's asian american communities through community organizing, storytelling, electoral organizing, and policy advocacy. we work in deep and transformative partnerships towards a hopeful future…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Shift Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MI PODER ↗
- Who funds LUPE VOTES ↗
- Who funds TIRRC VOTES ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI VOTES ACTION FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE EQUITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda ↗
- Who funds Equity for All Inc ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Sowega Rising ↗
- Who funds WOMEN ENGAGED INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA CONSERVATION VOTERS ED FUND ↗
- Who funds Barred Business Foundation ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Act 4 SA ↗
- Who funds KILOMETRO 0 INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN WOMEN IN MOTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds RepGA Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Georgia Muslim Voter Project ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA SHIFT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · New Venture Fund · Progeorgia State Table Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Justfundus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Justfundus?
Find your warmest path to Justfundus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.