How much did JUNEBUG FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of JUNEBUG FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

festival

2020

—

2021

fndheritagehopepolice

2022

hope

2023

hope

2024

—

2025

teamocps

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500

Median grant

States reached

$36k

Total assets

Largest grants

ORLANDO AFTER SCHOOL ALL STARS$6,455
BOYSGIRLS CLUB OF CENT FL$3,148
EIGHT WAVES$2,000
WEST ORANGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$535
UNITED ARTS$500
WEST ORANGE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE$500
ROPER YMCA$300
SHEPHERD'S HOPE$300
NATIONAL FIRES SAFETY COUNCIL$250
WINTER GARDEN POLICE ATHLETIC LEAG$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$279k · 16 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +212% since the first grant, against +62% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$279k

$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+212%

+62%

Still filing today

38%

54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $835 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OA
ORLANDO AFTER SCHOOL ALL STARS
7× · 2018–2024 · $19k · revenue +56%
WO
WEST ORANGE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE
7× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue +100%
EW
EIGHT WAVES
2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +29841%

Funded once

AA
ATHLETES AND CAUSESgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +141%
OH
ORLANDO HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +95%
BO
BRIDGES OF LIGHT FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Winter Haven Hospital Inc

To improve the health of all we serve through community-owned health care services that set the standard for high-quality, compassionate care.

Health

The Womens Care Florida Foundation

—

Leadership Florida Statewide Community

Community Improvement

Orlando Health Medical Group Inc

Outpatient and physician support services. provision of specialty physician services, outpatient physician billing services provided on behalf of exempt affiliates.

Health

Athena Orlando Womens Leadership

Athena orlando womens leadership inc. was formed for educational purposes to promote womens business initiatives and leadership skills development that benefit the local community. in addition, the organization was formed for charitable…

Education

University of West Florida

Scientific, educational, and charitable purposes, all for the advancement of the university of west florida.

Education

Orlando Health Inc

Our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health

University of Florida Alumni

Education and research and shaping a better future for florida, the nation and the world," as determined by the university of florida board of trustees. the association strengthens the gator nation by involving and engaging its alumni,…

Education

University of South Florida Foundation Inc

To accept, invest and distribute private gifts in support of the university of south florida.

Education

University of Florida

To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.

Education

Burnt Oranges Inc

Artist funding and advocacy by creating supportive spaces for unique artistic expression, including public outreach and education of the many forms of human creativity.

Arts & Culture

Walk On Water Ministries of Central Florida Inc

Walk On Water is a non-profit organization dedicated to giving individuals the opportunity to experience and bond with horses in a safe and loving environment. We are committed to teaching responsibility, self-confidence

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orlando After School All Stars Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leadership Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

15/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$255,956Recreation & Sports$33,870Education$12,205Health$9,300Arts & Culture$3,350Human Services$2,280Civil Rights$1,100Public Benefit$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC17.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · The Allen Family Foundation Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Orlando Health Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JUNEBUG FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BRIDGES OF LIGHT FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~28 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 342000924 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BRIDGES OF LIGHT FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 28 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Junebug Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Junebug Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JUNEBUG FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Junebug Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

JUNEBUG FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Junebug Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph