Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julius W Hegeler II Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$5.4MEducation$4.3MRecreation & Sports$3.9MHealth$2.0MHuman Services$1.6MCommunity Improvement$668kEmployment$500kReligion$239kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$2,400,200
Individual grant recipient$304,200
OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$255,000
DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$87,574
DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH$52,800
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
AMBUCS$30,000
MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY$30,000
DANVILLE SOCCER ASSOCIATION$25,000
VERMILION COUNTY MUSEUM$25,000
ART LEAGUE OF DANVILLE$18,000
DANVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
VERMILION FESTIVAL CHORUS$5,000
THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY$4,901
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $14 → 12%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $5k → 17%PROJECT SUCCESS OF VERMILION COUNTY INC: $102k → 17%MUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MA
IN
NE
VA
TN
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 34 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
34

Total granted

$18M
$991k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+57%

Still filing today

56%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +56% · 34% of their budget
  • WE
    WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500k · revenue +3%
  • DP
    DANVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • DP
    DANVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $153k
  • LL
    LAURA LEE FELLOWSHIP HOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $140k
  • TL
    TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Danville Regional Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Danville Neighborhood Development Corporation

Reimagine danville's neighborhoods as thriving, nuturing, safe places where residents are empowered to invest their time, energy, and resources to make a positive difference.

Community Improvement
3
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
4
Vermilion County Farm Bureau

Promote and preserve agriculture activities for members

—
5
Downtown Danville Association Dba River District Association

To ensure the long term viability of danville's river district as a center of business and civic life, and a source of community pride. rda carries out this mission through activities to attract and retain businesses, residents and…

Community Improvement
6
Danville Area Community Center

Dacc is a non-profit, community-owned facility. the center provides a wholesome, healthy environment and pledges that no person will be denied membership or access to programs. the dacc provides for members of all ages, a wide variety of…

Recreation & Sports
7
Dubuque Area Convention and Visitors Bureau

The Dubuque Area Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) will lead tourism destination promotion and development to enhance and expand the Dubuque Area experience.

Community Improvement
8
Danville Vermont Historical Society Inc

Our mission is to discover, preserve and share the history of the town of danville, vermont.

Arts & Culture
9
Indiana Dental Association Foundation for Dental Health Inc

Established for educational purposes including the public promotion of dental health and providing scholarships to students pursuing as dentists, dental hygienists, dental assistants, and laboratory technicians.

—
10
Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation Inc

Jdcf works to preserve and steward land and water for the lasting well-being of all people and wildlife.

Environment
11
The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Dansville Public Library

Dansville Public Library purchases and maintains a collection of books and other materials for loan to the public to meet the educational, informational, and recreational needs of its users, along with providing early literacy programs,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Danville Library Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,069,495 · Arts & CultureVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION+5 more: $190,283 · Arts & CultureDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2,128,600 · OtherDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEG…Individual grant recipient: $494,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $175,567 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DANVILLE: $170,000 · Other+47 more: $1,859,983 · Other+47 moreEAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $3,146,200 · Recreation & SportsEAST CENTRAL ILLINOI…Winterview Youth League: $226,735 · Recreation & SportsWinterview Youth Lea…+1 more: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsOSF Healthcare Foundation: $1,665,750 · HealthOSF Healthcare Fo…CROSSPOINT: $1,333,650 · HealthCROSSPOINT+2 more: $5,100 · HealthDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,478,564 · EducationDANVILLE A…MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $190,000 · EducationMILLIKIN U…+1 more: $50,000 · EducationWORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES: $500,000 · EmploymentPROJECT SUCCESS OF VERMILION COUNTY INC: $101,793 · Human ServicesMUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $4,901 · Human Services+1 more: $164 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$5,259,778Other$5,068,350Recreation & Sports$3,397,935Health$3,004,500Education$1,718,564Employment$500,000Human Services$131,858

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,069,495 over 3y, 62% of budgetEAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $3,146,200 over 2y, 100% of budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation: $1,665,750 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,478,564 over 5y, 34% of budgetCROSSPOINT: $1,333,650 over 2y, 11% of budgetWORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES: $500,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetWinterview Youth League: $226,735 over 2y, 89% of budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $175,567 over 2y, 11% of budgetDANVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $103,925 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS OF VERMILION COUNTY INC: $101,793 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetDANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $98,800 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetDANVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $60,300 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetOUTDOOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF VERMILION COUNTY ILLINOIS: $53,102 over 4y, 39% of budgetDANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH: $52,800 over 1y, 56% of budgetCulver Educational Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEGELER CARUS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetMUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $20,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF VERMILION COUNTY: $20,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetDANVILLE LIGHT OPERA CO INC dba DLO Musical Theatre: $15,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $4,901 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $164 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPOINT ↗
  • Who funds WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds Winterview Youth League ↗
  • Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS OF VERMILION COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUTDOOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF VERMILION COUNTY ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH ↗
  • Who funds Culver Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HEGELER CARUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vermilion County War Museum ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL43.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · John P Cadle Foundation · Vermilion Healthcare Foundation · Balloons Over Vermilion Nfp · Al Webster Foundation · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julius W Hegeler II Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julius W Hegeler II Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Julius W Hegeler II Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Julius W Hegeler II Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Julius W Hegeler II’s filings →

More from the funding graph