How much does Jpc Foundation give?

Jpc Foundation reported 81 grants totaling $522,782 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 37 and 49 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.

What does Jpc Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (45%), Health (12%), Religion (11%).

Who are Jpc Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: University of Wisconsin Foundation ($872k), Milwaukee Preservation Alliance ($200k), Forward Foundation Inc ($153k).

Does Jpc Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Jpc Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Jpc Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Alliant Energy Foundation Inc, Baird Foundation Inc, Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc.

Jpc Foundation

Jpc Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jpc Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$523k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$100k

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.2MHealth$325kReligion$295kArts & Culture$284kCommunity Improvement$156kHuman Services$135kEmployment$80kRecreation & Sports$46kOther$0

02FY2025 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k66 grants · $159k
$10k–50k14 grants · $264k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$7.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION	$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION	$40,000
KANDU INDUSTRIES INC	$33,333
EDGERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT	$25,000
UNION GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT	$20,000
BLACKHAWK VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC	$20,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY	$20,000
FISCC INC (FRIENDS OF THE WOODMAN'S CENTER)	$16,700
FORWARD FOUNDATION INC	$16,666
STOUGHTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC	$15,000
CRAFTSMAN WITH CHARACTER FOUNDATION INC	$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION INC	$12,000
GOOD SAMARITAN INN	$10,000
DECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION	$10,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH	$10,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.4M · 59 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.4M

$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+14%

Still filing today

49%

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
6× · 2020–2025 · $872k · revenue +29%
MP
MILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE
4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +339% · 36% of their budget
TU
THE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC
5× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +43%

Funded once

SP
ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $20k
SP
ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
one grant, 2020 · $20k
LL
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY-WISCONSIN CHAPTER
one grant, 2021 · $20k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter

Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health

Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit

University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education

University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—

Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement

Saint John's Communities Inc

Our mission is to enrich the lives of older adults through gracious retirement living, spiritual growth, cultural and educational opportunities and health care services.

Human Services

Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…

Environment

University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—

Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health

Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

67/67

Grantees still filing

41/67

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Education$1,004,128Other$954,224Arts & Culture$271,425Health$180,945Community Improvement$153,332Philanthropy$97,300Employment$79,947

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI56.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Hooper Corp Foundation · Madison Community Foundation · Janesville Foundation Inc · Seneca Foods Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Kennedy Family Foundation Inc · Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jpc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jpc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Jpc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home