Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph Perlman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$193kReligion$146kArts & Culture$19kEnvironment$9kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$8kEducation$7kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$638k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$31,500
AM SHALOM$16,620
NORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL$6,810
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$2,000
HIGHLAND PARK STRINGS$2,000
WBEZ$1,250
LURIE CHILDREN FOUNDATION$1,000
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$1,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$950
CAMP RAMAH$750
WORLDWIDE FUND FOR NATURE$700
WTTW$600
THE ARK$600
MUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$600
WFMT$550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $250 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $750 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $650 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $600 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $550 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $200 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $550 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $450 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$384k · 36 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
32

Total granted

$384k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+7%

Still filing today

56%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    7× · 2019–2025 · $192k · revenue +57%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • U
    USCS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
9
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Collaborative Arts Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
23/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $192,150 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyAM SHALOM: $100,050 · OtherAM SHALOMNORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL: $38,977 · OtherNORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH ELHIGHLAND PARK STRINGS: $7,950 · Other+60 more: $41,552 · Other+60 moreBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,250 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1,000 · Human ServicesUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $500 · Human ServicesNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $250 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,200 · Food & NutritionMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $330 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,800 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,550 · Arts & CultureMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $600 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $550 · Arts & CultureAIR ARTISTS-IN-RESIDENCE STUDIO: $450 · Arts & CultureCollaborative Arts Institute of Chicago: $300 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $600 · Environment
Philanthropy$192,400Other$188,529Education$7,000Human Services$7,000Food & Nutrition$5,630Arts & Culture$5,250Environment$4,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $192,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $1,632 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION COLORADO: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $930 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIR ARTISTS-IN-RESIDENCE STUDIO: $450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPERTUS INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCollaborative Arts Institute of Chicago: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEKAR: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL18.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Karmin Family Charitable Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph Perlman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph Perlman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph Perlman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph