Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph K Maloy and Marianna S Maloy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$66kEducation$37kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$24kCrime & Legal$16kReligion$15kCivil Rights$13kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$506k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION Rocky Mt Chapter$7,500
THE ARC OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA$5,000
The Discovery Center of the Southern Tier$4,800
SCHIZOPHRENIA & PSYCHOSIS ACTION ALLIANCE$3,000
A NEW HOPE CENTER INC$2,000
SAFE Inc$2,000
LITTELLLORD TRUST$1,950
AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION$1,500
PEO FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BRAWS$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Dress for Success: $250 → 13%The New Hope Center: $3k → 11%A NEW HOPE CENTER INC: $2k → 11%A NEW HOPE CENTER: $2k → 11%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES: $250 → 6%THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN SOCIETY: $3k → 20%CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE CENTER: $3k → 20%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY: $1k → 20%CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 16 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
41

Total granted

$134k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+25%

Still filing today

63%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $23k · revenue +29%
  • TA
    The Arc of Northern Virginia
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +59%
  • AN
    A NEW HOPE CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • E
    EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • R
    RESEARCH
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
2
North Carolina Victim Assistance Network

North carolina victim assistance network promotes the rights and needs of crime victims by educating north carolina's citizens and public policy leaders about the devastating impact that crime has on our society. serving our members as a…

—
3
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
4
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
5
Disability Law Center of Virginia

Dlcv's mission is to advance independence, choice and self-determination; protect legal, human, and civil rights; and eliminate abuse, neglect and discrimination of people with disabilities through zealous and uncompromising legal advocacy…

Human Services
6
Compass of Carolina Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate direction to individuals and families in need through counseling, education and financial benefits management.

Education
7
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
8
National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc

To enable the access and choice of america's seniors in their housing and care by providing data, analytics and connections that bring together investors and providers in the sector.

Human Services
9
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
10
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

—
11
Community Systems Support and Management Services Inc

Helping persons with disabilities to find happiness in their own homes, in their personal relationships, and as contributing members of their community.

Health
12
Ccri Inc

The mission of CCRI is to enhance and enrich the lives and learning of people with disabilities. We help people overcome obstacles by offering unique community opportunities to children, adults, and families affected by disability. Our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Hope Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inthrive Film Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEO FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherPEO FOUNDATIONCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION Rocky Mt Chapter: $14,500 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION Rocky Mt ChapterThe Arc of Northern Virginia: $13,000 · OtherThe Arc of Northern VirginiaLITTELL-LORD TRUST: $12,200 · OtherLITTELL-LORD TRUSTDiscovery Center: $9,500 · OtherDiscovery CenterEDUCATION: $7,350 · OtherRESEARCH: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICES: $5,350 · OtherTHE HOPE CENTER: $5,000 · OtherTHE LITTEL-LORD TRUST: $5,000 · Other+33 more: $49,150 · Other+33 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $23,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDA…FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $10,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE GUEST H…TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,000 · HealthTREATMENT ADVOCACY CEN…Schizophrenia and Related Disorders Alliance of America: $3,000 · HealthSchizophrenia and Rela…INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthA NEW HOPE CENTER INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $4,250 · Human ServicesCRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human Services+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentDiscovery Center of the So Tier Inc: $4,800 · Arts & CultureINTHRIVE FILM FESTIVAL: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentSouthern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $1,000 · EnvironmentCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $1,000 · EnvironmentFaith Alliance for Climate Solutions: $250 · EnvironmentBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$145,050Health$44,000Human Services$15,750Youth Development$6,000Arts & Culture$5,800Environment$3,750Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arc of Northern Virginia: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetA NEW HOPE CENTER INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDiscovery Center of the So Tier Inc: $4,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI-NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $4,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $4,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Women's Center: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEVIRGINIA2021 FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Prospects Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTILL I RUN: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFaith Alliance for Climate Solutions: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Northern Virginia ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Discovery Center of the So Tier Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAMI-NORTHERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Schizophrenia and Related Disorders Alliance of America ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia IncVA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Verizon Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph K Maloy and Marianna S Maloy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph K Maloy and Marianna S Maloy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph K Maloy and Marianna S Maloy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph