Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$254k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$745kAnimals$442kHuman Services$345kEducation$284kInternational$147kReligion$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kArts & Culture$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA Foundation$60,000
Hirshberg Fdn For Pancreatic Cancer$40,000
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network$25,000
WINGS OF RESCUE$25,000
Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Resear$20,000
WELLS BRING HOPE$15,000
Mark Foundation for Cancer Research$10,000
V Foundation for Cancer Research$10,000
Museum of Sonoma County$10,000
Arroyos Foothills Conservancy$10,000
Cheder Menachem$7,500
Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation$7,500
SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY$7,500
Escala Initiative$3,500
US FRIENDS OF DAVID SHELDRICK WILDL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $15k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
IA
IN
CA
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 19 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$1.8M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+14%

Still filing today

53%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $175k · revenue +73%
  • SS
    SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue +128%
  • TC
    THE CHASE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $140k · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • KF
    KATAHDIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue -97%
  • CI
    COTSEN INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY - U
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • UO
    UCLA Operation Mend
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
3
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
4
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
5
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
6
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Golden Bond Rescue of Oregon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S BUREAU: $185,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S BUREAULOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $175,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTEROPERATION MEND: $160,000 · OtherOPERATION MENDUCLAORTHO HOSPITAL CTR CEREBRAL PAL: $100,000 · OtherUCLAORTHO HOSPITAL CTR CEREBRAL PALUS FRIENDS OF DAVID SHELDRICK WILDL: $75,000 · OtherUS FRIENDS OF DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLKATAHDIN FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherWE CAN PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR NETWOR: $47,500 · OtherLustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Resear: $40,000 · OtherLA Fire Department Foundation: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $194,000 · Other+13 moreWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $275,000 · AnimalsWINGS OF RESCUE INCSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $162,500 · AnimalsSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVA…UCLA FOUNDATION: $275,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATI…+1 more: $3,500 · EducationTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $140,000 · HealthTHE CHASE FOU…Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $37,500 · HealthPediatric Bra…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $25,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CA…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI …THE V FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthWELLS BRING HOPE: $130,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyESCALA INITIATIVE INC: $17,000 · International
Other$1,071,500Animals$437,500Education$278,500Health$272,500Human Services$160,000Philanthropy$80,000International$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $275,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $275,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $162,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetWELLS BRING HOPE: $130,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKATAHDIN FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $37,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetESCALA INITIATIVE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEODORE PAYNE FOUNDATION FOR WILD FLOWERS AND NATIVE PLANTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGolden Bond Rescue of Oregon Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WELLS BRING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC ↗
  • Who funds KATAHDIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ESCALA INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THEODORE PAYNE FOUNDATION FOR WILD FLOWERS AND NATIVE PLANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds EL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Golden Bond Rescue of Oregon Inc ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Waters Charitable Remainder UnitrustCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Waters Charitable Remainder Unitrust · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph