Skip to content
Jonathan Rinehart Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jonathan Rinehart Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$143kAnimals$95kEducation$92kArts & Culture$63kHealth$32kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$16kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$961k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PINES FOUNDATION$28,500
NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE$20,000
FIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY$15,000
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$7,500
ELEVATIONS FOUNDATION$5,000
PATHWAYS EARLY EDUCATION CENTER$5,000
FLATIRONS CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DENVER ART MUSEUM$2,750
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS$2,500
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$2,500
COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED$2,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN COLORADO$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DNVR$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $5k → 14%NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$401k · 25 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$401k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+32%

Still filing today

68%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PINES FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $76k · revenue +99%
  • DZ
    DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $37k · revenue +33%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • EW
    EVERY WOMAN BIENNIAL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SH
    SCHNEEWEISS HEART DISEASE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TN
    THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN BLOCK ISL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
5
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
8
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
11
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $27,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSCHNEEWEISS ADULT CONGENITAL HEART CENTER AT COLUMBIA UNIV: $20,500 · OtherSCHNEEWEISS ADULT CONGENITAL HEART CENTER…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $12,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INCEVERY WOMAN BIENNIAL: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSCHNEEWEISS HEART DISEASE CENTER: $10,000 · OtherFLATIRONS CHURCH: $8,500 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherThe Greenway Foundation Inc: $6,500 · OtherELEVATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 · OtherPLATFORM INC: $7,000 · Other+9 more: $33,500 · Other+9 moreTHE PINES FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 · Community ImprovementTHE PINES FOUNDA…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $36,500 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHO…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $33,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF …UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $37,100 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLOGIC…Wildlife Conservation Society: $25,500 · AnimalsWildlife Conser…COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED: $9,000 · AnimalsCOLORADO TROUT …DENVER ART MUSEUM: $15,250 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART …FIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY INCORPORATED: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFIRE ISLAND…FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED A…NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $9,500 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PU…NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLOCK ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $2,500 · Environment+1 more: $500 · Environment
Other$191,000Community Improvement$76,000Education$75,000Animals$71,600Arts & Culture$52,750Human Services$35,000Environment$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PINES FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $37,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $36,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $33,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $25,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOCK ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC: $16,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $15,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY INCORPORATED: $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetELEVATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPLATFORM INC: $7,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetThe Greenway Foundation Inc: $6,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PINES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds BLOCK ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLATFORM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Greenway Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Colorado Gives FoundationCO12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jonathan Rinehart Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jonathan Rinehart Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jonathan Rinehart Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home