Skip to content
Joliet Foundation Co Club Oil & Gas In at a glance

· Private foundation

Joliet Foundation Co Club Oil & Gas In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$140kEducation$136kArts & Culture$110kHousing & Shelter$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kHealth$39kRecreation & Sports$21kAnimals$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGES PROJECT FOR EDUCATION$21,000
Individual grant recipient$19,750
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,500
OLIVE IN JULY INC$10,000
POVERTY ALLEVIATION CHICAGO$9,000
STANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL$7,000
CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY$7,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,000
ARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION FOR THE CERAMIC AR$7,000
EDUCATION CENTER OF THE ARTS AND SCIENCES$5,000
DISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC$5,000
GENEVA GLEN CAMP$3,500
CORE RESPONSE$3,000
ALEJANDRO ROQUE JIMENEZ FUNDACION INC$2,000
EXPERIMENTAL STATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%OLIVE IN JULY INC: $10k → 10%SPECIAL HEARTS FARM: $18k → 13%OLIVE IN JULY INC: $10k → 10%ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $7k → 16%OLIVE IN JULY INC: $10k → 10%ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $6k → 16%GO CAMPAIGN: $6k → 14%OLIVE IN JULY INC: $5k → 10%ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 16%GO CAMPAIGN: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 11%POVERTY ALLEVIATION CHICAGO: $9k → 14%POVERTY ALLEVIATION CHICAGO: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MA
IA
PA
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$499k · 23 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$499k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+23%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    STANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +56%
  • OI
    OLIVE IN JULY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +239%
  • CN
    CASA NUEVA VIDA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $34k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue 0%
  • SH
    SPECIAL HEARTS FARM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +535%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture
2
Community Music Center of Boston Inc

Community music center of boston ("cmcb") transforms lives throughout greater boston by providing equitable access to excellent music education and arts experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Art Department

Cultivates new and emerging Chicago artists, and aims to benefit artists by exploring art and learning. Through exhibitions, artist residencies, classes/workshops and community building, we are dedicated to cultivating new voices, ideas,…

Arts & Culture
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
Central Square Theater Inc

Central square theater, the oldest female-led theater organization in greater boston, is an innovator in the non-profit arts field in collaborative leadership. cst engages over 35,000 people annually through live performance, rigorous…

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
8
The Chicago Academy for the Arts

The chicago academy for the arts transforms emerging artists through a curriculum and culture which connect intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and creativity to impart the skills to lead and collaborate across diverse communities.

—
9
Boston Arts Summer Institute Inc
Recreation & Sports
10
Constellation Performing Arts

Constellation is a performing arts presenter with an emphasis on forward- thinking practices, particularly in the areas of jazz, improvised, experimental, and contemporary classical music.

Arts & Culture
11
Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the Boston Symphony Orchestra (BSO) is to foster and maintain an organization dedicated to making music consonant with the highest aspirations of the musical art, creating performances and providing educational and training…

Arts & Culture
12
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Hearts Farm Inc; the most unlike its peers is Olive in July Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCKY HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL: $37,000 · OtherROCKY HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOLCASA NUEVA VIDA: $34,000 · OtherCASA NUEVA VIDACRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $33,000 · OtherCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITYOLIVIA'S LIGHT LLC: $30,500 · OtherOLIVIA'S LIGHT LLCHOUSING NOW INC: $30,000 · OtherHOUSING NOW INCSALVATION ARMY: $29,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS: $21,000 · OtherARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION FOR THE CERAMIC ARTSARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION FOR THE CERAMIC AR: $21,000 · OtherARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION FOR THE CERAMIC ARIndividual grant recipient: $19,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherDISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $14,000 · Other+11 more: $54,750 · Other+11 moreOLIVE IN JULY INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesOLIVE IN JULY INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,833 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …SPECIAL HEARTS FARM INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL HEARTS FARM IN…ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesACTION FOR BOSTON COMM…LETTERS CHARITY: $18,000 · Human ServicesLETTERS CHARITYGo Campaign: $12,000 · Human ServicesGo CampaignSTANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL: $35,000 · EducationSTANLEY BR…Bridges Project for Education: $21,000 · EducationBridges Pr…SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationSANTA CATA…The People's Music School: $16,000 · Arts & CultureINTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $11,667 · Arts & CultureExperimental Sound Studio: $9,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCASA DE LA CULTURA DOMINICANA EN BOSTON INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureACCESS GALLERY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $25,667 · Community ImprovementTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $21,000 · AnimalsGENEVA GLEN CAMP INC: $15,166 · Youth Development
Other$355,000Human Services$131,833Education$61,000Arts & Culture$44,667Community Improvement$25,667Animals$21,000Youth Development$15,166

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVE IN JULY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetCASA NUEVA VIDA: $34,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,833 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $25,667 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBridges Project for Education: $21,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL HEARTS FARM INC: $18,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLETTERS CHARITY: $18,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetThe People's Music School: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGENEVA GLEN CAMP INC: $15,166 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGo Campaign: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $11,667 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetExperimental Sound Studio: $9,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE LA CULTURA DOMINICANA EN BOSTON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetACCESS GALLERY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFBI AGENTS ASSOCIATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine …National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joliet Foundation Co Club Oil & Gas In funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joliet Foundation Co Club Oil & Gas In. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Olive in July Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Action for Boston Community Development Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joliet Foundation Co Club Oil & Gas In’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home