Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Johnson Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Religion$228kEducation$50kInternational$16kRecreation & Sports$2kHealth$2k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Christian Workers Fellowship Fund Inc$3,000
Myrtle Beach Bible Chapel$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%American Foundation for Suicide Prevention: $100 → 17%Myrtle Beach Bible Chapel: $550 → 13%Christian Workers Fellowship Fund Inc: $15k → 16%Haw River Christian Academy Inc: $25k → 9%Mountain Top Youth Camp Inc: $750 → 11%Parkway Chapel: $150 → 15%Rockingham Council of Bible Education Inc: $60k → 17%Samaritan's Purse: $11k → 21%Truth for Life: $200 → 17%Myrtle Beach Bible Chapel: $250 → 13%Christian Workers Fellowship Fund Inc: $12k → 16%Haw River Christian Academy: $25k → 9%Mountain Top Youth Camp Inc: $500 → 11%Rockingham Council of Bible Education Inc: $60k → 17%Samaritan's Purse: $5k → 21%Myrtle Beach Bible Chapel: $200 → 13%Christian Workers Fellowship Fund Inc: $12k → 16%Mountain Top Youth Camp Inc: $100 → 11%Rockingham Council of Bible Education Inc: $50k → 17%Christian Workers Fellowship Fund Inc: $3k → 16%Reidsville Bible Chapel: $6k → 17%Reidsville Bible Chapel: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$298k · 9 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$298k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
0%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionRecreation & SportsHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROCKINGHAM COUNCIL OF BIBLE EDUCATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $170k · revenue +25%
  • HR
    HAW RIVER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +57%
  • CW
    CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP FUND INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SM
    SEARCH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $600
  • TF
    TRUTH FOR LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $200 · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of Certified Biblical

Training & certification of christian biblical counselors

2
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
3
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
4
Tmm Ministries Inc

The mission of TMM Ministries is to influence people for Jesus Christ. This is accomplished by conducting camps retreats and training sessions for children youth and adults at Cumberland Springs Bible Camp where the gospel of Jesus Christ…

Recreation & Sports
5
CrossTraining Ministry of Pilot Mountain
Religion
6
Restation Fellowship in Messiah

Religious studies

Religion
7
Mountain View Church of Christ

The primary purpose of the Church is to evangelize and to reach new members throughout the community, the state, the country and the world, spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
8
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

10
R B Thieme Jr Bible Ministries

R. B. Thieme, Jr., Bible Ministries exists to preserve, perpetuate, and disseminate the doctrinal and theological Bible teachings of R. B. Thieme, Jr. Our purpose is to make available his publications and recordings worldwide without…

11
Mountain Ministries

Teach Gospel in different ways

12
Redemption Seminary Inc

Redemption seminary helps adult christians grow in the grace and knowledge of our lord and savior jesus christ through quality distance education which enables learning within their ministry setting.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truth for Life and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKINGHAM COUNCIL OF BIBLE EDUCATION INC — $170,000 · ReligionROCKINGHAM COUNCIL OF BIBLE EDUCATION INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $16,388 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more — $200 · ReligionCHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP FUND INC — $41,900 · OtherCHRISTIAN WORKERS FEL…REIDSVILLE BIBLE CHAPEL INC — $12,600 · OtherREIDSVILLE BIBLE CHAP…+3 more — $1,750 · OtherHAW RIVER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $50,200 · EducationHAW RIVER CHRISTIAN…Mount Jubilee Ministries Inc — $2,100 · Recreation & SportsMOUNTAIN TOP YOUTH CAMP INC — $1,350 · Recreation & SportsGENESIS MINISTRIES OF ROCKINGHAM CO — $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $100 · Health
Religion$186,588Other$56,250Education$50,200Recreation & Sports$3,450Health$2,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCKINGHAM COUNCIL OF BIBLE EDUCATION INC — $170,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetHAW RIVER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $50,200 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP FUND INC — $41,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $16,388 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMount Jubilee Ministries Inc — $2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGENESIS MINISTRIES OF ROCKINGHAM CO — $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN TOP YOUTH CAMP INC — $1,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Johnson Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph