Skip to content
John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na at a glance

· Private foundation

John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$866k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.5MArts & Culture$1.0MHealth$437kAnimals$340kHuman Services$280kFood & Nutrition$110kYouth Development$110kEnvironment$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $576k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$100,000
Xavier University$76,317
Cincinnati Preservation Association$75,000
MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC$75,000
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS INC$50,000
Rollins College$50,000
Cincinnati Museum Center$50,000
Childrens Hospital Medical Center$50,000
The Seven Hills Schools$50,000
Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden$35,000
Ronald McDonald House Charities$30,000
Ohio Historical Society$30,000
Save The Animals Foundation$25,000
CINCINNATI YOUTH COLLABORATIVE$25,000
GREATER CINCINNATI TELEVISION EDUCATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%Stepping Stones Inc: $15k → 16%Stepping Stones Inc: $15k → 16%Stepping Stones Inc: $15k → 16%Stepping Stones Inc: $15k → 16%Stepping Stones Inc: $10k → 16%YWCA of Greater Cincinnati Inc: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 26 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
14

Total granted

$3.7M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+15%

Still filing today

85%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $327k · revenue +8%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $287k · revenue +27%
  • TS
    THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities of
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -1%
  • YO
    YWCA of Greater Cincinnati
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
2
Cincinnati Observatory Center

The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.

Arts & Culture
3
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
4
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
5
Cincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc

Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.

Animals
6
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
7
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
11
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
12
Cincinnati Museum Association

Through the power of art, we contribute to a more vibrant cincinnati by inspiring its people and connecting our communities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Save the Animals Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $326,709 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITYTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $275,000 · EducationTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOLROLLINS COLLEGE: $250,000 · EducationROLLINS COLLEGEMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $250,000 · EducationMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY …Cincinnati Youth Collaborative: $75,000 · EducationCincinnati Youth CollaborativeCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $350,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI PRESERVATION AS…OHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $245,000 · Arts & CultureOHIO HISTORY CONNECTIONCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $241,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTERTAFT MUSEUM OF ART: $70,000 · Arts & CultureTAFT MUSEUM OF ART+2 more: $40,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDARonald McDonald House Charities: $120,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House Ch…STARFIRE COUNCIL OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC: $60,000 · OtherSTARFIRE COUNCIL OF GREA…Grtr Cinti Television Educational Fndn: $60,000 · OtherGrtr Cinti Television Ed…Ronald McDonald House Charities of: $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC INNER-CITY SCHOOLS (CISE): $30,000 · OtherFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $75,000 · OtherFREESTORE FOODBANK INCJoy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc: $50,000 · OtherJoy Outdoor Education Ce…Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $30,000 · Other+12 more: $190,000 · Other+12 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $287,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …BEECHWOOD HOME: $85,000 · HealthBEECHWOOD H…Redwood School & Rehabilitation Inc: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $215,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICA…SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $125,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE …CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $125,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropySTEPPING STONES INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $25,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $25,000 · Human Services
Education$1,176,709Arts & Culture$946,000Other$845,000Health$397,000Animals$340,000Philanthropy$155,000Human Services$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $350,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $326,709 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $287,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $275,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $250,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $245,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $241,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $215,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $125,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBEECHWOOD HOME: $85,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTAFT MUSEUM OF ART: $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTARFIRE COUNCIL OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC: $60,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetJoy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHistoric Southwest Ohio Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHYDE PARK MULTI-SERVICE CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST FRANCIS SERAPH MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCISE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Sutphin Family Founda…Charles H Dater Found…John a Schroth Family…Williams FoundationThe Wohlgemuth Hersch…L & L Nippert Charita…Marge & Charles J Sch…Louise Taft Semple Fo…Pfau Charitable Found…Carol Ann and Ralph V…
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH37.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Williams Foundation · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na?

Find your warmest path to John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Hauck Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home